RSS

Author Archives: yishmaelgunzhard

La asimilación y el aceite de Januca

La asimilación y el aceite de Januca

La asimilación y el aceite de Januca

Entendiendo el significado de la batalla de Januca, una guerra como ninguna otra.

por

Si el aceite fuese una persona, de seguro sería condenado por su necia renuencia a mezclarse con los demás. Prefiere permanecer distante, separado y distinto. Mézclalo con agua y se mantendrá separado, conservando su identidad propia.

No importa cuánto trates, el aceite se mantendrá siempre fiel a su esencia y nunca se asimilará.

Quizás es por eso que mereció ser el símbolo principal del milagro de Januca.

Cuando celebramos la victoria de los macabeos sobre los griegos, debemos recordar lo que estaba realmente en juego en esta gran confrontación. Esta guerra fue distinta a cualquier otra guerra; no fue para conquistar más territorio, ni tampoco para capturar más riquezas o cuerpos. Esta guerra fue, principalmente, un conflicto entre dos formas completamente diferentes de entender el mundo.

La historia de Januca es sobre un choque de culturas. Los griegos no querían matar a los judíos. Su intención no era el genocidio de un pueblo, sino que era en cambio una batalla en contra de quienes amenazaban su compromiso al hedonismo, su amor por el cuerpo y su obsesión por las competencias atléticas para probar quién valía más. En estas cosas los griegos encontraban la belleza – y el significado mismo de la vida.

Keats describió muy bien el ideal griego en su magnífico poema ‘Ode On a Grecian Urn’:

Porque la belleza es verdad y la verdad es belleza, eso es todo lo que sabes y todo lo que necesitas saber.

Lo que los griegos adoraban era la santidad de la belleza. En cambio lo que los judíos querían enseñarle al mundo era la belleza de la santidad. Los griegos adoraban la santidad de la belleza. Los judíos le enseñaron al mundo la belleza de la santidad.

Fue la batalla entre estos dos ideales lo que definió la guerra de los macabeos. Es triste, pero hubo judíos que fueron seducidos por las seductoras artimañas del secularismo y abandonaron su antiguo legado. Vendieron sus bendiciones por un ‘plato de lentejas’. Renunciaron al mensaje de los profetas por la gloria de los juegos. Eligieron la recompensa pasajera del cuerpo por sobre las bendiciones eternas del espíritu. Son conocidos como los helenistas. Se asimilaron – y no se volvió a oír sobre ellos desde entonces.

La victoria de los macabeos fue el triunfo de quienes ejemplificaron la característica única del aceite y se rehusaron a asimilarse, eligiendo en cambio permanecer fieles a nuestra misión de traer al mundo la visión moral del judaísmo.

Eso es lo que hace que la historia de los Macabeos sea tan importante en nuestros tiempos.

Hace un tiempo hubo un amargo debate sobre una provocativa campaña publicitaria promocionada por un ministerio israelí. Parece que el Ministerio de Absorción pensó que sería buena idea convencer a los expatriados israelíes que viven en Estados Unidos de volver a su país, dramatizando el riesgo de asimilación de sus hijos y nietos en la diáspora. Los avisos promovían la idea que vivir fuera de la tierra judía amenazaba su lazo con el pasado, la tradición y la cultura judía.

Artículo Relacionado: Los Griegos y La Belleza.

Eso generó grandes discusiones. Un importante orador judío declaró: “No creo haber visto nunca una demostración israelí de desprecio hacia los judíos norteamericanos tan obvia como esos avisos”. Los críticos atacaron la campaña, considerándola un ataque vicioso “al judaísmo” de todos los que están fuera de Israel.

La ira era tan fuerte que la campaña fue retirada de inmediato. Obviamente estos avisos tocaron un nervio muy delicado. Perfectamente podría ser visto como una gran calumnia sobre la posibilidad de una vida judía fuera de Israel; la reacción, sin embargo, demostró claramente el gran miedo que genera la idea de la asimilación.

Y si los avisos estaban equivocados por la forma en que parecían diferenciar entre la vida en Estados Unidos e Israel, su mensaje igualmente debería ser reconocido como una advertencia para todos los judíos, independiente de dónde estén viviendo.

Porque al final de cuentas, después de más de 2.000 años, el espíritu de los macabeos pareciera estar perdiendo su batalla para evitar que los judíos se asimilen abrazando fervientemente la cultura secular y su ideología.

Los griegos nos dieron las olimpíadas. En una ironía que desafía toda lógica, los macabeos, que pelearon por la supremacía del Templo sobre el estadio deportivo, fueron elegidos como el nombre para las Macabiadas, el evento judío internacional similar a las olimpíadas que se realiza en Israel cada cuatro años.

Las competencias atléticas son una opción excelente para la recreación física. Pero dejan de ser admirables cuando se apoderan de nuestras vidas, como tantas veces lo hacen, no sólo en el ámbito profesional sino que incluso en los contextos universitarios.

Por favor no malentiendas lo que estoy diciendo. Los eventos deportivos están bien si son entendidos como complementos de una vida espiritual. Pero cuando se convierten en un fin en sí mismo, adoptamos un valor ajeno y nos asimilamos.

La asimilación hoy en día tiene muchas formas.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando lo único que queremos hacer es salir de fiesta, y nunca rezar

Nos hemos asimilado cuando lo único que nos importa es cómo nos vemos por fuera, y no lo que sentimos por dentro.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando nuestros objetivos más grandes son la fama y la fortuna, en lugar del amor y el aprendizaje.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando lo que más queremos es ser envidiados por los demás, en lugar de ser valorados por Dios.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando nuestro objetivo principal es acumular más bienes, en lugar de simplemente ser buenos.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando estamos mucho más interesados en nuestra herencia que en nuestro legado, en lo que obtenemos del pasado que en lo que le damos al futuro.

Nos hemos asimilado cuando vemos a nuestros hijos como cargas en lugar de bendiciones, y cuando creemos que lo mejor que les podemos dar son bienes en lugar de valores.

Nuestra tradición nos enseña que debemos reverenciar la belleza de la santidad. Es por eso que los macabeos lucharon, confrontando una cultura ajena que enfatizaba el cuerpo por sobre el alma, lo material por sobre lo espiritual. Ese sigue siendo nuestro desafío.

Al igual que el aceite en la historia de Januca, por ningún motivo debemos asimilarnos.

Al traer una luz aún más brillante a nuestros hogares cada noche con su respectiva llama, afirmamos nuestra creencia de que tendremos éxito. Conservamos la singularidad que nos permitió no sólo sobrevivir, sino también ser quienes transportan la antorcha de la moralidad y la civilización para toda la humanidad.

Segun tomado de, http://www.aishlatino.com/h/j/ep/Asimilacion-y-el-Aceite-de-Januca.html el jueves, 11 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 11, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

The Israel Law Center charges that the Presbyterian Church has illegally operated by maintaining illicit ties with Hezbollah.

The Israel Law Center charges that the Presbyterian Church has illegally operated by maintaining illicit ties with Hezbollah.

Presbyterian Church demonstrates against Israel. (Photo: stop-obama-now.net)

Shurat Hadin (The Israel Law Center), an NGO that combats terrorism through the use of international law, otherwise known as Lawfare, has filed a complaint against the Presbyterian Church USA (PCUSA), citing violations of the US tax code for unlawful political lobbying and contact with Hezbollah, the Jerusalem Post reports.

“It is high time the IRS took a long look at the Presbyterian Church and investigated its meeting with the designated-terrorist organization Hezbollah, its lobbying activities, and its anti-Israel divestment policies,” Shurat Hadin spokesman attorney Robert Tolchin told Jpost.

“The PCUSA is obsessed with attacking the Jewish state and has moved far from the activities which it presented to the IRS to secure its tax-free status in the United States.”

According to Shurat Hadin, PCUSA violated its own mission statement by engaging in political advocacy and “taking positions on the geo-political dispute between Palestinian Arabs and Israelis.”

Shurat Hadin has provided the IRS with “documentary and video evidence showing PCUSA delegates meeting with the US-designated terrorist group Hezbollah, publishing anti-Semitic materials, enacting a racist policy to divest from American companies doing business with Israel, lobbying the US Congress, and distributing political advocacy materials in violation of its tax-exempt status as a religious organization,” Jpost reports

Shurat Hadin further noted, “There is no mention in PCUSA organizing documents that it perceives fulfilling Christ’s work by meeting with and endorsing statements of a US-designated terrorist organization found to be responsible for the death of United States civilians and marines.”

A History of Presbyterian Anti-Israel and Anti-Semitic Activity

Hezbollah fighters salute during a graduation ceremony. (Photo: Islamic Counterterrorism Institute)

The Presbyterian Church has a long history of anti-Israel activity and collaborations with the BDS (Boycott, Divest, and Sanction) movement.

This past June they voted to divest and boycott companies that conduct business with Israeli firms situated in Judea and Samaria. In essence, such a resolution is harmful to the Palestinians themselves, who work at these companies. Causing the shutdown of these ventures would cause the Palestinians to lose their source of income.

Responding to this resolution, former US Governor Mike Huckabeestated that he was “embarrassed” for them. “I wondered who could be behind such an absurd decision,” he said, adding that he knows of individuals and member churches that are moving away from the denomination as a result.

NGO Monitor, an Israeli watchdog which tracks NGOs, published a paper in June following the resolution, showing that the Presbyterian Church’s decision was actually heavily influenced by anti-Semitism.

NGO Monitor shows that the Israel Palestine Mission Network (IPMN), which works within the Presbyterian Church, is the main advocate within the church on behalf of the BDS campaign. Numerous postings uploaded to this site by IPMN members over a period of two years demonstrate an ongoing pattern of expressions of anti-Semitism, including: “Zionist controlled America [has a] desperate lust” for war with Iran:, and “Jewish interests” are “corrupting” the US government, and the media is “owned” and “operated” by these same “Jewish interests.”

Segun tomado de, http://unitedwithisrael.org/israel-law-center-us-presbyterian-church-has-ties-with-hezbollah/?utm_source=MadMimi&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Israel+Accused+of+%27Barbaric+Murder%27+of+PA+Minister%3B+Sheik+Calls+to+Slaughter+All+Jews&utm_campaign=20141210_m123516824_Israel+Accused+of+%27Barbaric+Murder%27+of+PA+Minister%3B+Sheik+Calls+to+Slaughter+All+Jews&utm_term=more_btn_dark_jpg el miércoles, 10 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 10, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

El Hombre y la Mujer Según la Perspectiva de la Cábala

El Hombre y la Mujer Según la Perspectiva de la Cábala

 Por Tzvi Freeman

Rabí Shimon bar lojai (siglo II, EC)

Al salir de su lugar de arriba, cada alma es macho y hembra unidos. Sólo cuando descienden a este mun­do es que se separan, cada una a su propio lado. Y entonces es el Uno de arriba quien vuelve a unirlas. Ese es Su dominio exclusivo, porque sólo Él sabe cuál alma pertenece a cuál y cómo deben reunirse. (Zohar, Libro I, 85b)

Rabí Isaac Luria (“El Santo Ari” 1534 – 1572)

La persona a quien nuestra Torá habla no es ni hom­bre ni mujer, sino ambos combinados. Porque así fue como Adán fue creado y así es como somos en esencia. Dos medios cuerpos que son realmente uno. Las mentes son dos, pero los cuerpos, las almas y el núcleo mismo de esas dos personas son uno y el mismo.

Es por eso que el carácter y responsabilidades de un hombre y una mujer difieren, porque cada lado del cuerpo hace su parte para complementar a la otra. Después de todo, sería redundante que ambos lados hicieran lo mismo. (Taamei HaMitzvot, Breishit)

Rabí Moshé Cordovero (1522 – 1570)

Hay otro asunto acerca del cual deben tener gran cuidado, y es el de asegu­rarse de que la “Shejiná” siempre esté con ustedes y nunca se aparte de ustedes.

Ahora, antes que un hombre se case, obviamente la Shejiná no está con él en absoluto, ya que el elemento princi­pal que atrae a la Shejiná hacia una persona es el elemento femenino. De hecho, cada hombre está entre dos hem­bras: la mujer corpórea de aquí aba­jo, a la cuál debe proporcionar ali­mento, vestimenta y afecto. Y la Shejiná, que está sobre él para ben­decirlo con todas esas cosas, de ma­nera que él pueda volverse y propor­cionarlas a la mujer de su contrato.

(Nota del compilador: la Shejiná es la Presencia Divina. Cuando nos re­ferimos a D-os como trascendente, in­finito y que está más allá, lo llamamos El. Cuando nos referimos a D-os como inmanentemente aquí, ahora, de una manera nutricia, criadora, inte­rior, decimos que Ella es la Shejiná.)

(Tomer Devorá, cap. 9)

Rabí Elijah de Vidas (1518 – 1592)

El niño está enlazado a las mentes de los padres y a las acciones de los pa­dres, desde la concepción y a lo largo de la vida… El poder de los padres en materia de vestimenta, dónde ponen sus ojos y mentes, el cuidado que tienen con las purificadoras aguas de la mikve y el tiempo de separación, todo tiene gran efecto sobre los niños que aún están por nacer y sobre los ya crecidos.

(Reshit Jojmá, Shaar Hakedushá, cap. 16)

Rabí Schneur Zalman de Liadí (1745  – 1812)

Vean también las dos últimas bendicio­nes de la ceremonia de matrimonio: pri­mero decimos, “Él regocija al novio y a la novia”, poniendo al novio antes que a la novia. Pero luego concluimos: “El regocija al no­vio con la novia”. Implicamos que el regocijo del novio es de significación secundaria al de la novia.

Eso es porque ahora la novia recibe del novio, pero en el tiempo porvenir, serán ¡guales en su estatura con una única corona, tal como fue antes de que la luna fuera disminuida.

Así también decimos: “Una vez más, en las ciudades de Judá y en las calles de Jerusalén, se oirán la voz del novio y la voz de la novia”. Porque en el futuro, la novia también tendrá una voz. La luz interior de lo femenino saldrá y se revelará. Porque entonces, como dijimos, “una mujer de valor será la corona de su esposo”, incluso más allá del novio. Porque enton­ces el elemento femenino hará bri­llar una luz deliciosa, secreta, de la Mente Oculta.

Por lo tanto, en nuestro tiempo, la oración se dice a la sordina, dado que la novia aún no tiene voz, de­bido a que actualmente el ámbito de la palabra Divina no tiene significación ante los ámbitos más elevados de pensamiento y emo­ción, ya que se trata a una mujer como secundaria a su esposo. Pero en el tiempo porvenir, des­pués que todo se purifique y sane, cuando sea revelada la Mente Oculta del Deleite y la Conciencia, entonces la novia tendrá una gran voz sin limitación. Diremos en voz alta lo que hoy es la Oración Silenciosa, La sefirá de Realeza -que es la sefirá de la femineidad-será domi­nante. Tal como ha sido dicho, “una mujer de valor será la corona de su esposo”.

(Likutei Torá, Shir haShirim)

Rabí Dov Ber de Lubavitch (“El Mitler Rebe”, 1773 – 1820)

Los cielos besan la tierra con rayos de sol; la despier­tan con gotas de lluvia. Preñada, entrega vida, nutre vida, sostiene vida.

Los cielos más espirituales, los mundos de ángeles y almas, no tienen ese poder de crear de la nada, de transformar la muerte en vida. Porque la tierra en su fuente, está más allá de los cielos. Estos (los cielos) son la luz de D-os. Pero ella (la tierra) se extiende desde su misma Esencia. Y de su Esencia proviene ese po­der de causar ser. Es por eso que es el hombre que corre tras la mujer, y no al revés. Porque el alma de un hom­bre ve lo que le falta: la esencia mis­ma, el núcleo de ser. Y ve que sólo puede encontrarse en una mujer.

(Shaar HaEmuná, pág.55)

Rabí Menajem Mendel de LubaviTch (“TzémaJ Tzédek”, 1789 – 1866)

El amor se expresa mejor con las cosas que uno no hace. Hillel el Mayor dijo esto cuando resumió toda la Torá: “si a ti no te gusta algo, no se lo hagas a nadie”.

¿Qué es lo que a ti te disgusta más? No aprecias cuando alguien escudriña tus faltas, subrayando cada una con lápiz rojo. Así que si realmente deseas expresar amor a alguien, ni siquiera mi­res sus faltas. Encuentra lo que sea bue­no y habla sobre eso.

(Derej Mitzvoteja, Mitzvat Ahavat Is­rael)

Rabí Shmuel de Lubavitch (“Maharash”, 1834 – 1882)

Tal como un hombre ama a una mujer, así el Uno de arriba ama Su mundo.

Tal como un hombre desea vivir con la mujer que ama, así el Uno de arriba desea ser encontrado en toda su esen­cia dentro de su mundo.

Tal como la unión de un hombre y una mujer trae hijos a su propia imagen, cuando hay unidad entre creación y Creador, entre tierra y cielo, entre cuer­po y alma, entre espíritu y materia, allí encontrarás la Presencia Divina en toda Su gloria.

(Torat Shmuel, Drushei Jatuná, pág. 161)

Rabí Sholom DovBer de Lubavitch (“Rashab”, 1860 – 1920)

“Un hogar”, escribió Salomón el Sa­bio, “se construye con sabiduría”. Y no con un martillo. Porque la sabiduría es el pegamento de la belleza. La sabiduría, es decir la habilidad de dar un paso atrás y ver todo el panorama, el pasado, y, lo que es más importante, el futuro al que todo eso lle­va. Ver la verdad dentro de cada cosa.

Sin sabiduría solo hay fragmentos. Con sabiduría hay un todo. Y hay paz entre todas las partes de ese todo.

(Citado en Sefer Hasijot 5704, pág. 93)

Rabí Iosef Itzjak Schneersohn (el sexto Rebe de Lubavitch, 1880 -1950)

Palabras duras, exigencias y ultimá­tum; todo eso sacude los cimientos mismos de un matrimonio y de un ho­gar, derribando las paredes hasta que cada uno queda solo.

Palabras amables, palabras comprensi­vas, palabras atentas; ese es el tronco desde el que el matrimonio crece, los cimientos sobre los que se levanta la casa.

Un hogar no puede ser reparado a me­nos que sus cimientos sean firmes. Una vez que una pareja aprende a hablar como amigos, su matrimonio puede so­portar cualquier cosa, por siempre.

(Sefer HaSijot 5703, pág. 293)

RabÍ Menajem Mendel Schneerson (el séptimo Rebe de Lubavitch)

Un rey sin reina, dice el Zohar, no es ni grande ni rey. Porque es la mujer quien da al hombre el poder para conquistar su espacio.

Y es el hombre quien da poder a lo mu­jer para penetrar y nutrir el de ella. Y entonces el hombre aprenderá de su mujer que él también puede llegar den­tro de otros y aportar nutrición. Y la mu­jer aprenderá que ella también puede conquistar.

(De una charla, Shabat Parashat Noaj, 1991)

Según tomado de, http://www.es.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/534615/jewish/El-Hombre-y-la-Mujer-Segn-la-Perspectiva-de-la-Cbala.htm el miércoles 10 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 10, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Who are East Jerusalem’s ‘permanent residents’?

Who are East Jerusalem’s ‘permanent residents’?
They were born and bred in the capital, but they aren’t Israeli citizens and their status is anything but permanent. In some cases, it may even be revoked.
By Ariel David | Dec. 9, 2014 | 11:22 AM |

A map of East and West Jerusalem.
A map of East and West Jerusalem.
It is called permanent residency status, but like many other things in the Middle East, it can be anything but permanent.

With the recent flare-up in violence centering around Jerusalem, the Israeli government has been threatening to revoke the residency, or citizenship, of East Jerusalem Arabs who are involved in terrorism – even if only by association through a relative.

Interior Minister Gilad Erdan made good on this threat recently by ordering the deportation to the Palestinian territories of the widow of one of the two terrorists who attacked a Jerusalem synagogue on November 18, killing four worshippers and a policeman.

Erdan also revoked the residency permit of the East Jerusalem Palestinian driver for the suicide bomber who carried out the attack on the Dolphinarium club in Tel Aviv in 2001, killing 21 people.

Daniel Bar-On

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will advance a law to revoke the residency rights of terrorists and their relatives, as well as imposing a ban on those convicted of incitement from receiving state benefits.

But who are these permanent residents who are among those at the center of the storm? What exactly is their status and in what way can they be considered akin to immigrants in their own home?

When Israel annexed East Jerusalem following the Six-Day War of 1967, it granted the inhabitants of the newly captured neighborhoods permanent residency status and offered them citizenship.

At present, according to the Central Bureau of Statistics, out of a total population of 815,000, there are now some 300,000 Arabs in Jerusalem. Only 12 percent of them have Israeli citizenship, the Interior Ministry reports. Obtaining citizenship demands various procedures like swearing allegiance to the Jewish state and showing some knowledge of Hebrew, but rights groups say the main problem is the social taboo surrounding such a move: Palestinians feel that the process implies recognizing Israel’s sovereignty over East Jerusalem, which they claim as capital of their future state.

That is why most East Jerusalemites continue to live in the city as permanent residents, the same status afforded to non-Jewish foreigners who move to Israel (Jewish immigrants can easily obtain citizenship thanks to the Law of Return).

Permanent residents are issued the same blue ID card as Israelis, which allows them to live and work anywhere in the country, grants them social benefits and health insurance, and gives them the right to vote in local elections – although most Palestinians boycott the polls for the same reason they refuse to go through the citizenship process.

Unlike full citizens of the country, they cannot vote in national elections, have no passport and, as Palestinians, they remain stateless. “They live in a legal no-man’s land,” says Steven Beck, director of international relations at the Association for Civil Rights in Israel.

The status of these individuals is similar to that of the Druze living in the Israeli-annexed Golan Heights: The latter have permanent residency and largely refuse to take Israeli citizenship but, unlike Jerusalem’s Palestinians, they are officially considered Syrian nationals.

The blue ID card offers East Jerusalemites undoubted advantages compared to Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip, who have green ID cards issued by the Palestinian Authority in coordination with Israel. Holders of those cards need a permit from Israeli military authorities to enter or work in the country, and must go through long lines at army checkpoints. For residents of Gaza, which is almost completely sealed off, permits are granted even more rarely and usually only for humanitarian or religious reasons.

A Palestinian rift

The difference in rights between East Jerusalem Arabs and their West Bank neighbors has created rifts between the two Palestinian communities and can greatly influence the daily lives of their members, Beck explained in a telephone interview with Haaretz.

For example, when a Palestinian from East Jerusalem marries a Palestinian woman from outside the city, the couple will often have to move to the West Bank, as Israel rarely grants family-reunification requests, he said.

Despite its name, the residency permit is also not necessarily permanent. Figures compiled by the B’Tselem human rights group show that since 1967 Israel has revoked the residency of more than 14,000 Palestinians, often without warning. While links to terror groups have prompted such a step in the past, most revocations were done because the person had moved for a period to the West Bank or had gone to study or work abroad.

The number of cases in which residency has been rescinded has fluctuated wildly over the years, in keeping with oscillating Israeli regulations. According to B’Tselem, between 1995 and 2000, people who had not lived in the city for the previous seven consecutive years lost their residency, even if they had periodically returned. Following a petition to the Supreme Court, this policy was amended.

In response to a request from Haaretz, the Interior Ministry said that currently permanent residency status “expires” only if a person has lived abroad for more than seven years without returning.

Citizenship is also not exactly permanent, as the law allows for it to be revoked in cases of treason, espionage and terrorism. According to ACRI attorney Oded Feller, only two Arab Israelis have been stripped of their nationality on this basis.

Human rights groups strongly oppose revocation of residency or citzenship even in the cases of those who commit even the most heinous crimes.

“Residency status and social security benefits are not a favor granted by the authorities,” B’Tselem said in a statement last week. “It is Israel’s fundamental obligation toward all individuals living within its territory, be they citizens or permanent residents. As long as Israel considers East Jerusalem part of the country, it cannot eschew these obligations, and they remain in effect even when citizens or residents break the law.”

The organization also condemned measures taken “against the innocent family members” of people who have broken the law.

The Interior Ministry declined to comment further on the government’s steps in this regard, referring reporters to remarks made recently by Erdan. Following his decision to deport the wife of one of the synagogue attackers, the minister stressed that such moves constitute a deterrent.

“Everyone who is involved in terrorism must take into consideration that there are liable to be consequences for his family,” Erdan said.

Segun tomado de, http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.630605 el martes 9 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 9, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Israel Struggles With Its Identity

Photo

Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday before a vote to dissolve Parliament partly over a bill on Israel’s status. CreditThomas Coex/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

JERUSALEM — When Israel was founded nearly seven decades ago, its Declaration of Independence clearly defined the new nation as a Jewish state.

But the document also enshrined democracy as a core principle, ensuring “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants.”

Now Israelis and Jews abroad are roiled by debate over whether Israel can continue to be both a Jewish homeland and the lone democracy in a region torn apart by ethnic and religious strife.

Israel’s Parliament was dissolved on Monday in part over legislation proposed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other ultranationalist politicians that some Israelis fear would elevate the state’s Jewishness above its democratic character, exposing the inherent tension in the nation’s core principles with a law that critics say would subject a fifth of its citizens to permanent second-class status.

After a tumultuous year of failed peace talks with the Palestinians, a grueling war with militants in the Gaza Strip, continuing terrorist attacks and swelling criticism in Europe and the United States, Israel, still an adolescent nation, is going through something of an identity crisis.

“We believe this is the essence of what this state is about — real equality and having Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people — but more and more Israelis are asking themselves whether this combination is really an option,” said Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute. “We have constitutional principles, but we don’t have a constitution, so the basic character of the state is not really secured.”

Drafts of the so-called nationality bills would remove Arabic as an official language alongside Hebrew, increase the influence of Jewish law, reduce the power of the Supreme Court, and entrench the automatic citizenship of Jews worldwide and Jewish symbols of the state. The proposals, put off until the outcome of the parliamentary elections next year, do not mention the word “equality” or provide rights for non-Jews, though they would preserve voting rights for all citizens.

As the new legislation emphasizes, Israel would aspire to be not an Israeli homeland but one for all Jews, which Palestinian citizens find particularly offensive because their relatives are refugees who fled or were expelled in 1948. Few would dispute that, say, France can be both a French homeland and a democracy with non-French citizens, but Israel is a different case, not least because its Arab and Druse minorities are indigenous, not immigrant.

Israelis from across the political spectrum and leaders of the Jewish diaspora have denounced the proposals as superfluous, redundant, embarrassing, dangerous and ill timed. Palestinians within Israel and outside it are also virulently opposed, but they say it unmasks what they call a facade of a democracy that has long been discriminatory.

“They have the right of self-determination, but this self-determination has to be formulated in a very creative way,” said Amal Jamal, a political scientist at Tel Aviv University. “You cannot put it in a way that makes equality impossible and makes me strange in my own home, exiles me in my own house. This is very, very problematic, and that’s the sense, that’s the feeling.”

With prospects for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict at a nadir, some analysts say the revival of the nationality bills is fueled by fears of a single entity between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea where Jews would not be a clear majority.

In an increasingly hostile environment, Avigdor Lieberman, Israel’s foreign minister, has reiterated his call for a transfer of Arab-Israeli towns to a future Palestinian state. Mr. Netanyahu, meanwhile, has raised the possibility of revoking citizenship or residency rights of relatives of people who attack Jews or anyone who expresses support for the attackers.

Hundreds of left-leaning Israeli Jews protested the proposed legislation outside the prime minister’s residence last weekend. Thousands of Palestinians overlaid their Facebook profile photos with a “Class B Citizen” stamp that one organizer of the campaign likened to the yellow stars European Jews were forced to wear during the Holocaust.

Critics include Israel’s new president, Reuven Rivlin, who opposes a Palestinian state but has positioned himself as a champion of the state’s Arab citizens. “Does this bill not in fact play into the hands of those who seek to slander us?” Mr. Rivlin asked in a recent speech.

There has been an outpouring of outrage from American Jews reflecting alienation from Israel’s political and religious shift rightward.

“There was something about this bill that really pushed people’s buttons,” said Deborah Lipstadt, an Emory University historian of the Holocaust, whose op-ed against the law in The Wall Street Journal last week was her first public criticism of Israel.

“I think it’s a drip-drip; I think it’s cumulative,” she said. “If it had strategic value I would say what the hell, but it seems to be a purely political thing which serves no purpose except sort of a child on the playground saying, ‘Ha ha ha ha, this is who we are.’ ”

Proponents of the legislation argue that it is a necessary counterbalance to existing laws promoting equality. Mr. Netanyahu also insisted on Palestinian recognition of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people during the American-brokered negotiations this spring, and he has repeated in recent days that this is essential to any peace deal.

Mr. Netanyahu and other politicians routinely speak of themselves as the leaders of the Jewish people, not some melting-pot Israeli mixture. The flag bears the Star of David, and the national anthem describes the “yearning of the Jewish soul” to be “a free nation in our land,” a conundrum for Palestinian citizens highlighted in 2012 when an Arab justice on the Supreme Court — for many a symbol of the democracy’s success — declined to sing it at a public ceremony.

That same court last year rejected an appeal by 21 citizens to be identified in the national registry as “Israeli” rather than by religion or ethnicity, saying that doing so would have “weighty implications” and could endanger the state’s founding principles.

Democracy Institute surveys show waning support among Israeli Arabs for the state defining itself as both Jewish and democratic, from two-thirds in 2003 to less than half in 2012.

Mohammed Zeidan, director of the Arab Association for Human Rights, and other advocates attribute this to rising discrimination. They point to laws that allow committees to screen potential residents of small communities and that prohibit funding for groups that commemorate the Nakba, or catastrophe, as Palestinians call their expulsion as Israel was established.

Because Arabs are generally exempt from military service, they are also disadvantaged by programs favoring veterans for housing, jobs, bank loans and scholarships; the Druse, who do serve in the army and have been among those killed in the recent attacks, also have condemned the new legislation.

Said Abu Shakra, who runs an art gallery in Umm al Fahm, said Arab-Israeli institutions like his receive just 2 percent of the nation’s cultural funding. Professor Jamal said the Arab city of Nazareth has twice the population but 5 percent of the land of its neighbor, predominantly Jewish Upper Nazareth, where there are many more public parks and services.

Hanin Majadli, who helped promote the “Class B Citizen” Facebook campaign, said she was rejected for a Tel Aviv apartment when the landlord found out she was not Jewish. Ayman Siseck, a fiction writer, said he was detained for two hours at the airport this year while traveling with a group of Israeli authors to a literary convention in Germany.

“Maybe I have been kidding myself about this place,” said Mr. Siseck, 30, who writes in Hebrew, which he calls his “stepmother tongue.”

“I was born here, my family was born here in Jaffa, many generations of my family, and suddenly the prime minister goes on television and says, ‘This is not your country; this is the country of the Jewish people,’ ” Mr. Siseck said. “What does this mean for me? I’m not of the Jewish people. You can’t say the rights of every citizen will be maintained if you’re saying that these rights are secondary to national identity. There’s a logical failure here.”

Ruth Gavison, a law professor at Hebrew University who spent a year studying the issue for the justice minister whom Mr. Netanyahu ousted last week as he called for early elections, recommended that no legislation be enacted.

“The power” of Israel’s founding vision “lies in its vagueness,” she wrote in a paper submitted last month. “A Jewish nation-state law may upset the balance between elements crucial for maintaining the vision as a whole.”

Segun tomado de, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/world/middleeast/israels-nationality-bill-stirs-debate-over-religious-and-democratic-identity.html?emc=edit_tnt_20141209&nlid=64717990&tntemail0=y&_r=0 el martes, 9 de dic. de 2014

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 9, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Why Couldn’t the Jews and Greeks Just Get Along?

Why Couldn’t the Jews and Greeks Just Get Along?

Question:

It’s hard for me to get into Chanukah. As far as I can see, the whole thing was a major disaster. Here we have a meeting of two rich cultures, with so much to share, so much to contribute to the world together, so much synergy that could happen, and instead, BOOM! — the extremists of both sides hit the battlefield.

I don’t get it. The Greeks were universalists. They were open to new ideas from wherever they came. They spread knowledge and understanding throughout the Mediterranean. Here was an opportunity to take Jewish values to the world, to go public. Why couldn’t those Maccabee hotheads work out some sort of compromise?

The Short Answer:

Actually, this was the greatest thing that could have happened to the Greek mind: To discover that one thing it could not tolerate — something like the massage therapist who helps you to find that one trigger point where you can’t be touched.

For the Jew, as well, this was a defining experience. The red lines became clear, and with those guidelines, the essential Torah was made able to survive to this day.

The Long Answer:

You’re right about one thing: The whole Chanukah story was completely out of character for Ancient Greece. I don’t believe there was any other culture they ever oppressed or forbade. Every new culture had its set of gods and rituals, and that was just great. “Hey, you got gods? We got gods, too! Here, let’s trade god cards! How ’bout mix and match? You got rituals? You got belief-systems? We’re into all that stuff! We’ll even help you make big, pretty statues!” Greeks were great syncretists — meaning, they could jerry together every culture of the known world and make one big tzimmes out of all of it.

So what on earth did they have against the Jews?

Sure, there were political power-plays going on that were the ostensible reasons for the conflict. But it’s obvious there was something deeper at play. Some subliminal annoyance that brought out the worst in the Greek and pushed theMaccabees to revolt. Apparently, there was something about the Jewish mind that didn’t mix and match.

Now look at it from the Jewish side: Jews have also borrowed from every culture they’ve come in contact with. Whatever your grandmother tells you, Abraham did not smear his gefilte fish with chrane. One culture we borrowed more from than perhaps any other was that of Ancient Greece. The Talmud tells us that the only language the Torah could be translated into elegantly is Greek. They said it was a beautiful language. They say that of all peoples, the Greeks had ideas closest to ours. They praised many of the Greek philosophers. Maimonides wrote that Aristotle was half a prophet. The Seder Hadorot, a kind of classic Jewish history book, claims that Aristotle was really Jewish!

So what is going on here? Why such a violent clash? Why were the Jews unable to work out some sort of compromise with a Hellenist ruler?

We need to know because in a very real way, Chanukah lives on. Our society today is a bizarre grafting of these two cultures, the Hellenist and the Jewish. If this conflict existed back then, the question is, has there been some resolution over time? Or are we still fighting Greek elephants? Simply put: Is our society schizoid?

Head-To-Head — and Beyond

So here’s how the conversation goes. Which conversation? The conversation that’s been going on ever since the Greek mind and the Jewish mind met one another, almost two and a half millennia ago. Where does it happen? Mostly, somewhere deep inside Jewish minds:

Greek: So tell us about your gods, Mr. Maccabee.

Jew: Um, that’s singular.

Greek: Okay, tell me about your gods.

Jew: No, not you. G-d. G-d is singular. Only one god.

Greek: Don’t worry, we’ve got so many I’m sure we can spare a few.

Jew: That’s okay, one is enough.

Greek: So, this one G-d, what does He look like? We’d love to make some nice statues for you. You poor, uncultured people, you have no statues!

Jew: That’s because He doesn’t have looks.

Greek: No looks? Ugly? That’s cool! A god of ugliness! Don’t worry, we can make ugly statues, too.

Jew: No, no. He has no looks at all. You can’t see Him.

Greek: An invisible G-d? Well, maybe we can do that in glass. But you have to give us some description.

Jew: Nope. Sorry. No description.

Greek: You mean nobody ever saw Him? How can you worship something if you don’t know what it looks like? I mean, how do you know He exists in the first place?

Jew: It’s not that we don’t know what He looks like. He doesn’t have any looks. He has no image.

Greek: Well, I’m sorry then. If He has no image, we can’t make a statue.

Jew: That’s fine with us.

Greek: But we’d like to write books about Him. So just give us some definition and we’ll work around it.

Jew: Oh, our G-d can’t be defined.

Greek: Come, now. Everything has to have a definition. Or else it’s not a thing.

J: But G-d is not a thing. He creates things. But He isn’t a thing.

G: Oh! So He is the Cosmic Mind Who conceives and shapes all forms from the primal essence-matter.

J: No, He doesn’t just form them, He creates them. Out of nothing.

G: Now you’re getting silly. You can’t make something out of nothing. You need stuff to make it out of.

J: But there wasn’t any stuff when things began.

G: There was always stuff. How else could the Cosmic Mind make anything?

J: Out of nothing!

G: Look, you Jews don’t really think straight. But that’s okay. We’ve conquered all sorts of primitive cultures. You’ll learn, too. So, you worship the Cosmic Mind — you’ll get along just great with Aristotle and…

J: No, He’s not just the Cosmic Mind.

G: Well, nothing’s higher than the Cosmic Mind.

J: Because that’s not who He is. I mean, even if He didn’t make a world, He would still be G-d. So you can’t say, “that’s who He is — the One that makes a world.” There doesn’t have to be a world for Him to exist.

G: Of course there has to be a world. Otherwise, why is there a world if there doesn’t have to be one? The world makes sense. The Cosmic Mind makes sense. That’s what it’s all about. Reason. The highest and most perfect of all things. We Greeks will teach you all about that. So, now tell me about your rituals. We Greeks really dig rituals. Any that have to do with wine? Parties?

J: Sure, we make kiddush on Friday night to commemorate the Creation of the world from nothing.

G: Well, you can give up that one now, since I’ve just shown you that creation of the world from nothing makes no sense whatsoever.

J: We don’t eat milk with meat.

G: Why not?

J: G-d says so.

G: For what reason?

J: Reason? He needs a reason? For the same reason He created heaven and earth!

G: Which is?

J: He just wanted to.

G: That’s not a reason!

J: Sure it is. He decided He would like a world where there would be milk and meat and He would tell people, “Don’t eat that milk and meat together!” and they would listen.

G: That makes no sense. That’s not a reason!

J: Reason is just another of His creations.

G: Reason is the ultimate! There is nothing higher than Reason!

J: Okay then, explain to me why the world is the way it is. Why does one plus one equal two? Why does the square of the length of the hypotenuse equal the sum of the squares of the lengths of the other two sides? Why do parallel lines never meet?

G: Because those are the rules of geometry!

J: So why does the Cosmic Mind, as you call Him, have to follow your rules of geometry?

G: They’re not our rules! They are the self-evident truths of nature!

J: Why are these the truths and not something else?

G: You stubborn Jew! Don’t you see that this is the most elegant, rational way things could be?

J: I’ll bet you He could break them. I’ll bet our G-d could make a world where parallel lines meet. He could break any of the laws of nature.

G: You can’t break laws of nature! They’re not like laws of the state or like your silly laws about cheeseburgers. They are truths. They are perfect. They are the ground of reality. They are because they have to be.

J: Nothing has to be. Nothing but the Source of Being. But He could be any way He wants.

G: Geometry has to be. Cause and effect has to be. Logic has to be. If A = B then B = A. That is an absolute Truth. It must be.

J: Why?

G: Why?! Because if they don’t have to be, then I and you and this whole world have no real substance! And that cannot be!

J: That’s just what I was trying to tell you. This world has no real substance. The only truth is…

G: Don’t say it, Mr. Maccabee! You people are downright dangerous.

And that is why the Greeks did not forbid Jewish practice altogether. What they (initially) forbade were those practices that they saw as irrational. Those practices that Jews do simply because they believe they have a relationship with a Being who is higher than reason. That, they could not tolerate.

Of course, as you know, eventually some bright boys came up with geometries where parallel lines meet; cause and effect got bumped out of quantum physics; the world was discovered to have had a beginning; and even now it still is really nothing because the sum of all radiant energy minus all of the universe’s mass equals zero. Most of us today have accepted that there are things that are the way they are not for any reason, but just because that’s the way they are. Nothing has to be the way it is. Why do masses attract? Why is the grass green? Why is there anything at all? There doesn’t have to be a reason for everything, because reason is not the foundation of reality. So what’s so absurd about connecting to the Foundation of Reality through mitzvot that are beyond reason?

Mind Under Matter

Nevertheless, the battle continues. You see, as mentioned above, the Greek mind, aside from worshipping human intellect, is also a great syncretist. That means it can hammer together the most incongruous ideologies without blinking an eyelid. You’ve heard of Rice-Christians? Peyote-Catholics? The Greek mind could do any of that, and more.

The two characteristics go hand in hand: When there’s nothing higher than intellect, intellect has no guiding light. Everything, even the stupidest thing — as long as it doesn’t deny intellect — can be tolerated. Aristotle knew that the pantheon of Athenian gods was nonsense. But what’s wrong with the common people, who cannot understand any better, having their way?

You can easily see that a knowledge of an absolute Divine Will beyond reason has become a necessity for human survival. Without the supposition of a Divine Will, whatever you wish to make sense can make sense. If your system of logic cannot support an idea, just change the postulates and rethink the data. Anything can be made to make sense when you determine the assumptions. Every society has had its philosophers and philosophers have justified everything imaginable — from coliseum killing games to gas chambers.

Strangely, this may have worked to humanity’s advantage in one regard: The Greek mind applied itself to figuring out the material world. When your belief system begins with Divine revelation you don’t necessarily apply yourself to mundane matters of how things work. So technological progress became chiefly the domain of the Greek mind throughout history.

But it also has some nefarious consequences. Because when you marry intellect and materialism (a good description of Stalin’s Russia and Hitler’s Germany), you’ve entered a bottomless pit of quicksand.

Which brings us to a fascinating point. The Lubavitcher Rebbe points out that in Hebrew, the name for ancient Greece, Yavan, has another meaning: quicksand (as in Psalms 40:3 and Talmud, Eruvin 19a). Water mixes with sand, dirt and clay. You step in it and you can’t get out. The more you try to climb up, the further down you go.

Take a look at the letters that spell Yavan in Hebrew: יון . It starts with a small point of a yud — representing wisdom. That stretches down to become a vav. And the vav stretches even further down, below the line, to become a long nun. It’s all a description of the process of intellect sinking into the material world and, with nothing to hold it in place, sinking further and further.

A Donkey and an Ox

Today, we have those syncretists who wish to marry materialism with Torah. And nothing is less congruous than that.

Materialism is the ultimate of Greece stuck in the mud. It is the idea that all that exists is that which can be observed, described and explained. Evolutionism, for example, is a materialistic explanation of existence. When people became disillusioned with the church and with faith, they needed an explanation of existence that relied on Chance and Necessity alone, without recourse to G-d. Darwinism and current cosmologies provide just that. So do the standard interpretations of history we are taught today.

Torah is an understanding that behind the world lies a Divine Will, unhampered by the limitations of nature or human logic — because it is the source of all this. Why are there laws of nature? Because G-d generally chooses to work in consistent ways. Why did history unfold the way it did? Because that is all in G-d’s plan.

When someone tries to provide a materialistic explanation for Torah and mitzvot, they are creating a Procrustean bed, killing all sense of Torah in the process. So too, attempting to resolve conflicts between evolutionary doctrines and Torah makes less sense than marrying a donkey to an ox.

Yes, we try to understand as much as we can. The Torah commands us to think deeply, to immerse our intellects in study and comprehension. Whatever we can fit into intellect, we must strive to do so. Whatever explanation we can give, we must give it. But always with the sense that with every new grain of understanding, we have expanded the seashore of the Infinite Unknowable.

We can have a thousand reasons for not mixing meat and milk, but when it comes down to it, we do it because that is our personal connection with the Divine Will, the Life of All Things. And that is the victory of Chanukah.

Segun tomado de, http://www.chabad.org/holidays/chanukah/article_cdo/aid/789831/jewish/Couldnt-the-Jews-and-Greeks-Get-Along.htm el lunes, 8 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 8, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Why Do Jews Give Two Names?

Why Do Jews Give Two Names?

“A good name is to be chosen rather than great riches, and favor is better than silver or gold.”
(Proverbs 22:1)

According to a recently published article in the Jewish Press, the naming of Jewish babies is a rather complicated element of Jewish culture. The Jewish Press claimed that the difficulty in Jewish baby naming is “because Jewish parents are compelled not only to select a secular name, but also a Jewish one for their babies.”

People often find it challenging to select one name for their baby, but choosing two names can be daunting. When families move to Israel and retain their foreign passports, a whole new series of complications can arise. While a Hebrew or Biblical inspired name may work well on an Israeli passport, it could become difficult to translate or transliterate on foreign passports and documents.

There are some names which can be used easily in both their original Hebrew as well as English such as; Abraham, Levi, Isaac, Rachel, Sara, Noa, Ezra, Aaron, etc… But often finding a translation for  many popular modern Hebrew names such as Dudu, Osnat, Moran, Shachar, and Biblical names such as Chanoch, or Chizkiyahu can be troublesome.

So why choose a name that would require a different secular, or non-Jewish name in addition to the original? This question has bothered parents and scholars alike for generations, ever since the custom of the double name originated.

Find Out What Your Hebrew Name Is Today!

Historically, Ashkenazi (Eastern and Central European Jewish origin) Jews have bestowed two names upon their children ever since the 12th century; “Many Jews working outside the Shtetl decided to adopt a secular name that would help them to be better understood by the non-Jewish communities and be accepted by them. Besides this, their name also could be easily pronounced by the outside world and they could be better understood.”

While Jews no longer lead completely insular lives in a shtetl, the custom remains to provide Jewish babies with both Jewish and secular names.These days, Jews will often use their secular name for everyday use, and reserve their Jewish name for religious purposes.

A Jewish teen is likely to need her or his Hebrew name when they are called to the Torah at their Bar or Bat Mitzvah, at their wedding, and at various other religious affairs.

Having a second Jewish name actually distinguishes the Jewish community from other faiths, while at the same time reminds Jews of their traditions and roots. There are numerous customs and traditions surrounding Jewish baby names. The extra complication involved however,reminds the Jewish people that although they are no longer confined to the Shtetl, they still very much are a unique people with strong links to the past.

Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/25233/jews-give-two-names/#xvsfff8jTLwCJ0WC.99

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 6, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

3,800-Year-Old Fortress Uncovered in City of David (Photos)

3,800-Year-Old Fortress Uncovered in City of David (Photos)

By Ahuva Balofsky April 16, 2014 , 10:32 am

“And the king said unto them: ‘Take with you the servants of your lord, and cause Solomon my son to ride upon mine own mule, and bring him down to Gihon. And let Zadok the priest and Nathan the prophet anoint him there king over Israel; and blow ye with the horn, and say: Long live king Solomon. Then ye shall come up after him, and he shall come and sit upon my throne; for he shall be king in my stead; and I have appointed him to be prince over Israel and over Judah.’” (1 Kings 1:33-35)

City of David

City of David (Photo: Deror Avi/ Wiki Commons)

The book of 2 Samuel describes David’s conquest of Jerusalem from the Jebusites: “And David said on that day: ‘Whosoever smiteth the Jebusites, and getteth up to the gutter, and [taketh away] the lame and the blind, that are hated of David’s soul–.’ Wherefore they say: ‘There are the blind and the lame; he cannot come into the house.’” (2 Samuel 5:8)  Following fifteen years of excavations, the possible site of that conquest and gutter was inaugurated  in a secret ceremony which took place before Passover.

The fortress, built some 3,800 years ago, is being called the Spring House for its location over the mouth of the Gihon spring.  That spring is the same one where David had his son Solomon crowned as his successor to the throne.

Passageway to the Gihon Spring. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

Passageway to the Gihon Spring. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

“When we open the Bible and read about King Solomon who was crowned here, on the Gihon Spring – today you can come and see: this is where it happened. This is where it all started,” said Oriya Desberg, the manager of development at the City of David.

Spring House was a Canaanite fortress built in the 18th century BCE, and is one of the largest pre-Herodian structures ever uncovered.  It was excavated in one of the most complex and unique digs ever completed in Israel.  The excavation, headed by Professor Ronny Reich from Haifa University and Eli Shukron from the Israel Antiquities Authority, took fifteen years.

The location and construction of the fortress serve to protect the spring and allow access only from the western side, within the city.

“In order to protect the water source, they built not only the tower – but also a fortified passageway that allowed the city residents a safe access to the water source,” archaeologist Joe Uziel said. “This very impressive structure was operating until the end of the Iron Age, and it was only when the First Temple was destroyed that the fortress fell into ruin and stopped being used.”

(Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

(Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

Excavations at the site actually began in 1867, 100 years before Israel reunified the Old City of Jerusalem.  They were funded by the Palestine Exploration Fund and led by Captain Charles Warren.  The first to reach the Spring House, however, was treasure-hunter Montague Parker, a real-life Indiana Jones searching for the lost Ark of the Covenant and King Solomon’s treasures. He had no authority to dig, so he bribed the Turks to look the other way as he explored. He operated there from 1909 to 1911, when he was noticed by an alert guard who was not in his pay.  He was forced to flee to Cyprus for fear of his life.  The remains of his century-old excavations can be seen in the fortress’s upper part.

Stones that are between 2-3 meters wide were used to build the fortress. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

Stones that are between 2-3 meters wide were used to build the fortress. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

The walls of the fortress are seven meters (nearly 23 feet) thick, and are made of 2-3 meter (6.5-10 foot) large stones.  The fortress was impressively constructed without the use of mechanical tools.

The dig took 15 years to complete. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)

The dig took 15 years to complete. (Photo: Eli Mandelbaum/ IAA)
Read more at http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/13753/3800-year-old-fortress-uncovered-city-david-photos/#mHk9OrX6uqilg1ht.99

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 6, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

¿POR QUÉ SALIMOS A DESPEDIR A LOS ÁNGELES DE SHABAT?

¿Por qué salimos a despedir a los ángeles de Shabat?

Imagínate que una persona invita a gente a comer en su casa. Le presenta los invitados a su familia, se sienta a la mesa, les da la bienvenida y antes de que pasen tres minutos, antes de que se sirva el primer bocado de comida, se les muestra a los invitados la puerta y se les pide que salgan.

En un primer momento, supondríamos que los invitados hicieron o dijeron algo inapropiado o irreverente y perdieron así su derecho a sentarse a la mesa, pero no sucedió eso. Los invitados hasta elogiaron a los anfitriones. ¡Cuesta creerlo!

¿Y si les dijera que esto se repite cada semana del año en varios miles de hogares?

Todos invitamos a dos ángeles ‒uno “bueno” y otro “malo”‒ a nuestro hogar cada viernes a la noche. El Talmud (Shabat 119.ª) cuenta que el viernes a la noche dos ángeles nos acompañan cuando volvemos a casa de la sinagoga, y cuando ven que la casa está llena de luz y de ese único e inigualable aroma del Shabat, y ven que nosotros y toda la familia llevan puesta la mejor ropa en honor del Shabat, el ángel bueno declara que corresponde que la semana que viene encuentren lo mismo, y el ángel malo se ve forzado a responder “Amén”.

Es en su honor que entonamos el himno Shalom Aleijem el viernes a la noche (haz clic aquí para el texto completo). En este himno, les deseamos paz a estos ángeles, les damos la bienvenida, les pedimos que nos bendigan y luego les damos la despedida:

La paz sea con ustedes, ángeles ministrantes, mensajeros del Altísimo…

Que su arribo sea en paz, ángeles de paz, mensajeros del Altísimo…

Bendígannos con paz, ángeles de paz…

Que su partida sea en paz, ángeles de paz…

¿Por qué no pueden quedarse?

Si bien se ofrecen distintas respuestas a esta pregunta1, yo quisiera compartir con ustedes una fascinante respuesta que oí, que dio el Rebe de Slonim, elNetivot Shalom.

En el capítulo 32 del Génesis, vemos cómo Jacob, tras huir de su suegro Labán para irse de Jarán, confrontó el hecho de que su hermano Esav, que durante años estuvo distanciado de él, se aproximaba ahora con un ejército de cuatrocientos hombres. Lo último que supo de Esav fue que quería matarlo. Al ver esta escena, pensó que no era precisamente un comité de bienvenida de Canaán…

Jacob se apresta para la guerra y para la paz. Hace que su familia cruce el límite y, entonces, por alguna razón inexplicable, él cruza furtivamente al otro lado del río2. Allí se ve confrontado por un hombre. Todos los comentaristas coinciden en que este hombre era un ángel que representaba a Esav.

Jacob se quedó solo y un hombre forcejeó con él hasta el despunte del alba(Génesis 32: 25).

Nuestros sabios describen esta confrontación como una batalla por la eterna superioridad moral. Pero no es eso lo que me interesa en este momento. Lo que me interesa es el hecho de que Jacob estuvo solo todo ese tiempo. El Jizkuni, que fue un comentarista bíblico de la Edad Media, hasta amonesta a los hijos de Jacob por haberle permitido a su padre que se ponga a sí mismo, él solo, en una situación tan precaria y opina que la prohibición de comer el nervio ciático, que fue la consecuencia resultante de este encuentro, era para castigar a las tribus por optar por irse a dormir en una noche en la que iba a tener lugar uno de los conflictos más grandes de la historia.

Sin embargo, el Rebe de Slonim adopta un enfoque completamente diferente. Él nos enseña que al estar solo uno alcanza el más alto nivel de reunión con el Todopoderoso. En una instancia anterior del Libro del Génesis (28: 12-15), se nos cuenta acerca del sueño más grande de Jacob. Este vio Una escalera apoyada en la tierra cuyo extremo llegaba al cielo y he aquí que ángeles de Dios subían y bajaban por ella. Di-s le habló a Jacob durante los momentos en que no había ángeles a su lado, es decir, después de que los ángeles ascendieran y antes de que volvieran a descender; los ángeles terrestres habían retornado al Cielo y los ángeles celestiales todavía no habían llegado a la tierra. Ese fue el momento más sagrado porque, finalmente, nosotros los seres humanos somos más grandes que los ángeles. El súmmum de la santidad se encuentra en la privacidad.

Del mismo modo, Jacob no se encontraba junto a sus hijos ni junto al resto de su entorno en el momento en que tuvo lugar su gran lucha. Jacob estaba solo.

En Yom Kipur (el día más sagrado de todo el año), el Sumo Sacerdote (que es la encarnación de la mayor santidad que existe sobre la tierra) entraba al Santo de Santos del Templo Sagrado (que era el sitio de mayor santidad de toda la tierra). En relación con dicha entrada, dice la Torá:

No había ninguna persona en la Tienda cuando [el Sumo Sacerdote] venía a ofrendar expiación en el Santo, hasta que salía (Levítico 16:17).

En este momento tan extraordinariamente sagrado, el Sumo Sacerdote se encontraba a solas con el Todopoderoso.

Este versículo emplea el término kodesh para describir “el Santo”. Otra palabra que surge de la misma raíz es kidushín, o sea, casamiento. Inmediatamente después de la ceremonia de casamiento, los novios tienen que ir a una habitación en la que puedan estar a solas (ijud). Ijud significa “aislado, singular”. Uno puede estar a solas meramente en virtud de que no tiene a nadie a su lado; pero “solo” también puede significar que algo es singular o especial o único.

Existe un Midrash muy bello (Midrash Rabá, Génesis 77: 1) que expresa este mismo concepto:

Con respecto a Di-s está escrito: “Y solamente Di-s será exaltado ese día’ (Isaías 2: 11). Vemos que en el caso de Jacob se emplea una expresión similar: ‘Y Jacob se quedó solo”.

En Shabat, queremos estar a solas con el Todopoderoso y, por eso, nos excusamos ante los ángeles. “¡Ángeles sagrados!” ‒exclamamos‒ “Apreciamos enormemente el que hayan llegado a nuestros hogares, valoramos su presencia y atesoramos sus bendiciones, ¡por favor, vuelvan!, pero por favor, perdónennos si ahora les pedimos que se vayan, ¡es que ahora queremos estar a solas con Di-s!”.

En la mayoría de los libros de oraciones, se menciona la costumbre de recitar dos versículos del Libro de Salmos inmediatamente después de decir Shalom Aleijem:

Porque dará encargo a Sus ángeles acerca de ti, para que te guarden en todos tus caminos (Salmos 91: 11).

Di-s cuidará tu ida y tu venida desde ahora y para siempre (Salmos 121: 8).

¿Por qué se yuxtaponen ambos versículos? El primero nos recuerda que Di-s nos envía ángeles, pero el objetivo no es el mensajero, sino el hecho de estar a solas con el Todopoderoso; a fin de cuentas, confiamos únicamente en Di-s para sentirnos protegidos en nuestras idas y venidas.

Segun tomado de, http://www.es.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2058774/jewish/Tiempo-a-solas.htm el sábado 6 de dic. de 2014.

Notas al Pie
1. Hay quienes afirman que solamente estamos despidiendo a los ángeles del resto de la semana; pero queremos que los ángeles de Shabat se queden con nosotros (Shem MiShmuel). Otros sostienen que sabemos que los ángeles se van a quedar solamente mientras dure el Shabat, por lo que en determinado momento -cuando termine el Shabat- se van a ir. Es por eso que el Jida sostiene que el texto correcto es “betzetjem” -cuando se vayan, que vayan en paz. Otra respuesta que encontré es que los ángeles nos dejan para ascender más y más gracias a la abundancia de mitzvot que hacemos en Shabat. Por lo tanto, podemos decir que no les estamos mostrando la puerta para que se vayan, sino que les estamos mostrando el portal de la productividad, para que se eleven cada vez más basándose en nuestros actos. Rabí Yosef Yitzjak Schneerson, el sexto Rebe de Lubavitch, insinúa que en virtud de lo preciado que es cada momento del tiempo del ángel, nosotros en realidad le estamos mostrando respeto al decirles que apreciamos los pocos momentos que pasaron junto a nosotros, y comprendemos que ahora ellos tienen otras tareas que cumplir.

Hay quienes directamente no recitan la cuarta estrofa y recitan únicamente las primeras tres (Rabí Jacob Emden, Zijrón Yehudá; Likutey Maharíaj; Darkei Jaim VeShalom).

2. Rashi, basándose en el Talmud, explica que Jacob regresó para buscar unos pequeños jarritos, poniendo así de manifiesto toda su diligencia e integridad. El nieto de Rashi, el Rashbam (que es conocido por ser un comentarista que solamente aceptaba el significado simple del texto) afirma que Jacob volvió a cruzar el río porque se estaba escapando de Esav. Jacob supuso que Esav estaba resentido con Jacob, y no con la familia de este, y que se iría si no estaba presente aquel que le había causado tanto sufrimiento. Sea como fuere, el resultado es el mismo, no importa qué interpretación uno prefiera.
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 6, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

¿Qué es, exactamente, la Torá?

¿Qué es, exactamente, la Torá?

La Torá

Torá y Biblia

Generalmente la gente traduce Torá como “Biblia” cuando, en realidad, representan dos conceptos radicalmente diferentes. “Biblia” quiere decir “libro” mientras que “Torá” quiere decir “enseñanza”. Un libro contiene información que no necesariamente me compromete a hacer algo al respecto. La Torá contiene enseñanzas que definen cómo debo vivir mi vida.

La palabra Torá tiene diferentes acepciones, desde la más genérica hasta la más específica. A veces se utiliza para referirse específicamente a los cinco libros del Pentateuco a diferencia de los demás libros sagrados del Tanaj: Neviim
(Profetas) y Ketuvim (Sagradas Escrituras). A veces se utiliza como término genérico que abarca todo el abanico de lo que deriva de los cinco libros del Pentateuco, o sea los demás libros sagrados del Tanaj, como también la Mishná, el Talmud, Midrash, la Halajá, la Kabalá, el Musar, la Jakirá y el Jasidismo.

Veamos – resumidamente – en qué consiste cada uno de los términos mencionados.

En su esencia, la Torá es la comunicación de la sabiduría y voluntad Divinas. Es por medio de la Torá que uno se entera y se conecta con cómo D-os entiende las cosas y cómo quiere que nos comportemos.

Torá Shebijtav y Torá Shebeal Pe

Las enseñanzas que D-os le dio a Moshé fueron transmitidas en dos partes, una parte le fue dictada y documentada por Moshé en los cinco libros del Pentateuco (Génesis, Exodo, Levítico, Números y Deuteronomio). Esta es el comienzo de lo que está denominada Torá Shebijtav o “Enseñanza Escrita” que incluye los 24 libros del Tanaj. No todos los pormenores de los preceptos fueron escritos; muchos fueron transmitidos por Moshé oralmente a su generación. Ellos, a su vez, los transmitieron a la que le siguió y así fueron transmitidos de generación en generación hasta el día de hoy. Ese cuerpo de información está denominado Torá Shebeal Pe o “Enseñanza Oral”.

Tanaj

La palabra Tanaj es en realidad un conjunto de siglas que representan tres palabras: Torá, Neviim, Ketuvim. Son los 24 libros sagrados que documentan la historia de los jueces, reyes y profetas de Israel, sus profecías y enseñanzas. Los cinco libros de la Torá abarcan los primeros 2.488 años de la historia del mundo, desde su creación hasta el fallecimiento de Moshé. Los demás libros del Tanaj siguen con la historia de Iehoshúa (Josué), sucesor de Moshé, hasta el Libro de Esther que documenta la historia de Purim en el año 3.370 (392 A. E. C.).

Mishná

Dicha transmisión oral siguió por medio de los sabios denominados Tanaim hasta el año 3.910 (149 E. C.) cuando el sabio Rabí Iehudá Hanasí entendió que se corría el peligro de que esa transmisión se perdiera y anotó todo en forma resumida, ordenada temáticamente en sesenta tomos, agrupados a su vez en seis “órdenes”, o temas generales (a saber: leyes de Agricultura, Festividades, Matrimonio, Daños, Sacrificios, Pureza). La obra en su conjunto fue denominada Shishá Sidrei Mishná (Seis Ordenes de Estudio) o por sus siglas, Sha”s.

Talmud

Si bien la Mishná contiene muchísimos detalles prácticos que no aparecen explícitamente en la “ley escrita”, sigue siendo un texto muy sintetizado, sirviendo más bien como “apuntes” que hacen recordar mucha más información. Esa información siguió siendo transmitida oralmente por los sabios denominados Amoraim hasta que en el año 4.260 (499 E. C.) los sabios Ravina y Rav Ashi y sus discípulos la documentaron en la Guemará. El conjunto de Mishná y Guemará es los que constituye el Talmud. De hecho, hay dos versiones del Talmud, la Babilónica y la Jerusalemita, la más autoritativa siendo la versión babilónica.

Midrash

Paralelamente al Talmud están los midrashim o textos de exégesis que contienen detalles y dimensiones de interpretación no literales de los versículos que en su mayor parte no entraron en los textos del Talmud.

Halajá

Halajá es un término que refiere a las conclusiones prácticas de todas las discusiones rabínicas en el Talmud. Estas conclusiones fueron dilucidadas y recopiladas en las obras de varias autoridades ilustres a lo largo de la historia como Maimónides en su Mishné Torá, el Rabí Iosef Caro en su Shuljan Aruj, Rabi Moshé Iserles en su “Mapá”, y, en una versión resumida, en el Kitzur Shuljan Aruj, para mencionar sólo algunas de las más destacadas obras. Dichos textos – y muchos más – sirven como base para evaluar, por medio de la metodología entregada a Moshé en el Sinaí, cualquier situación que surja en la vida personal o comunitaria para la cual se necesita una orientación y resolución Halájica.

Kabalá

Kabalá quiere decir “recibir” y se refiere a los secretos de la Torá, recibidos en el Sinaí, que fueron transmitidos celosamente de generación en generación a eruditos especialmente seleccionados por su piedad, inteligencia, carácter y confiabilidad. El libro principal de esta disciplina, escrito en un lenguaje complejo y metafórico, es el Zohar de la autoría del gran Taná, Rabí Shimón bar Iojai (c. 100-160 E. C.).

Musar

La Torá contiene enseñanzas de ética personal, denominado Musar. Uno de los libros más destacados es Shaarei Teshuvá de la autoría de Rabeinu Ioná de Gerona.

Jakirá

La dimensión filosófica de la Torá es denominada Jakirá. Entre los tantos libros sobre el tema se destacan el Moré Nevujim (“Guía de los Perplejos”) escrito por Maimónides y el Kuzari por Rabí Iehudá Halevi.

Jasidismo

En el año 5.494 (1.734 e. c.) apareció el jasidismo por medio del místico Rabí Israel Baal Shem Tov. Revolucionó la manera de pensar y sentir judíos y su efecto reverbera hasta el día de hoy. Basadas en las fuentes más profundas del judaísmo, las enseñanzas del jasidismo son presentadas de tal manera que cualquiera, sin importar su nivel de erudición, puede entender y nutrirse de ellas, para vivir una vida más inspirada.

El exponente máximo del jasidismo, el Rebe de Lubavitch, que su mérito nos proteja, por medio de sus prolíficas enseñanzas es cada vez más una fuente de inspiración y educación para millones que buscan armonizar su judaísmo con la vida en el mundo moderno. Una buena puerta de entrada a esa cosmovisión es la serie de libros titulada El Rebe Enseña.

Fue en Shavuot que la Torá nos fue entregada; ahora está en ti recibirla.

Según tomado de, http://www.es.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2068713/jewish/Tor.htm el sábado 6 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 6, 2014 in Uncategorized