RSS

Author Archives: yishmaelgunzhard

¿Cuál es la Diferencia Entre Ortodoxo, Conservador y Reformista?

¿Cuál es la Diferencia Entre Ortodoxo, Conservador y Reformista?

Pregunta:

¿Cuál es la diferencia entre el judaísmo Ortodoxo, el judaísmo Conservador y el judaísmo Reformista?

Respuesta:

Posiblemente no sea la persona indicada para responder a esta pregunta ya que, personalmente, no creo que haya “ismos” en ser judío. Simplemente somos judíos, con nuestraTorá y nuestra voluntad de ser judíos.

Sin embargo, voy a tratar de dar una descripción objetiva de lo que estos “ismos” significan en términos prácticos:

Hasta el Siglo XIX éramos meramente judíos. Manteníamos la Halajá, -es decir la interpretación rabínica de las normas y pautas de la Torá- y durante 3.000 años, desde el Sinaí, venimos manteniendo una firme tradición. Si algún individuo o grupo se desviaba de la Halajá, generalmente era alejado del pueblo judío.

Luego vinieron los Reformistas. Su punto de vista era: “las cosas están cambiando. Ahora sabemos que no hay necesidad de mantener la kashrut, elShabat, la circuncisión o creer en un retorno a Sión”. En Alemania decían: “Berlín es nuestro Jerusalén”. En los EE.UU. era Washington.

Luego vinieron los Conservadores: Su punto de vista era: “Estos rabinos reformistas han ido demasiado lejos. Es preciso conservar algunas de las tradiciones básicas del judaísmo”. De modo que revivieron una forma de alimentación kasher, del Shabat y de la circuncisión. Pero no estaban demasiado convencidos con respecto al tema Washington.

Aquellos judíos que no seguían estas líneas de pensamientos eran catalogados como “Ortodoxos”. Ellos nunca pidieron ser llamados así, pero éste fue el nombre que se les dio. En lo que me es personal no me veo como ortodoxo, ya que pienso acerca de mi judaísmo como algo muy radical y bueno, poco ortodoxo.

Tampoco veo el motivo que puede haber para reformar mi judaísmo. Preferiría que mi judaísmo me reformara a mí. Después de todo, aquellas cosas que los padres de la reforma vieron como algo obsoleto ahora están de moda nuevamente y son cada vez más populares. Por ejemplo, en los últimos diez años el número de alimentos kasher que hay en el mercado se incrementó en un 2000%. Y en lo que se refiere a Jerusalén, la realidad es bastante obvia. En 1948 el movimiento reformista dio una marcada media vuelta.

Ahora bien, apuesto que con lo anterior he provocado más preguntas que las respuestas que he podido ofrecer. Pero eso está bien porque es parte de lo que es ser judío, poder pensar libremente y plantear preguntas.

Segun tomado de, http://www.es.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/575897/jewish/Cul-es-la-Diferencia-Entre-Ortodoxo-Conservador-y-Reformista.htm el sábado 6 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 6, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Israeli Legal Advocacy Group Urges IRS to Strip Presbyterian Church of Non-Profit Status

Israeli Legal Advocacy Group Urges IRS to Strip Presbyterian Church of Non-Profit Status

DECEMBER 4, 2014 1:52 PM 7 COMMENTS

Author: Ben Cohen

A prominent Israeli legal advocacy group is urging the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to investigate the Presbyterian Church USA for engaging in what it describes as “a range of prohibited activities under U.S. tax law” that are focused on the vilification of the State of Israel.

Shurat HaDin (Israel Law Center,) a group which combats anti-Israel and anti-Semitic activities through legal action, is seeking the revocation of PCUSA’s tax-exempt status.

“It’s high time that the IRS investigated the PCUSA,” Nitsana Darshan- Leitner, Director of the Israel Law Center, told The Algemeiner. “They present themselves as a religious body, but they act as a political organization, working against Israel by, for example, meeting with the terrorists of Hezbollah and promoting the anti-Semitic BDS movement.”

Tension between the PCUSA and Jewish groups has been rising since the church voted at its July 2013 General Assembly to divest approximately $21 million of its shares in Caterpillar, Hewlett-Packard and Motorola on the grounds that these companies conduct business in the Israeli-controlled West Bank.

In its 38 page complaint to the IRS, Shurat HaDin has provided what it says is documentary and video evidence showing PCUSA delegates meeting with the Lebanese Islamist  group Hezbollah, which is designated as a terrorist organization in the United States. The complaint also highlights the PCUSA “publishing anti-Semitic materials, enacting a racist policy to divest from American companies doing business with Israel, lobbying the U.S. Congress, and distributing political advocacy materials in violation of its tax-exempt status as a religious organization.”

Such actions, Shura HaDin contends, violate the non-profit tax-exempt status granted to the PCUSA by the IRS in 1964. At the time, the group says, the PCUSA presented itself to the IRS as a religious body, “engaging in peaceful relationships with individuals of all faiths and wholly unengaged in political activities.”

Fifty years later, according to Shura HaDin, that original mission has been completely distorted by the church’s continual involvement in anti-Israel activity. “There is no mention of political advocacy, taking positions on the geopolitical dispute between Palestinian Arabs and Israelis, or PCUSA’s political campaign against Zionism,” Shurat HaDin argued in its submission to the IRS. “There is no mention in PCUSA organizing documents that it perceives fulfilling Christ’s work by meeting with and endorsing statements of a U.S.-designated terrorist organization found to be responsible for the death of United States civilians and marines.  In fact, PCUSA has taken numerous, extensive, and costly efforts to engage in political anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic acts.”

“The PCUSA should not enjoy the benefits of charitable status,” Darshan-Leitner said. “If you want to become an advocacy organziation, you have to change your status with the IRS. You can’t be both a church and a political organization, because the IRS treats these types of organization differently.”

Segun tomado de, http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/12/04/israeli-legal-advocacy-group-urges-irs-to-strip-presbyterian-church-of-non-profit-status/ el jueves, 4 de nov. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 4, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Photos of the Last Remaining Synagogues in the Muslim World

Photos of the Last Remaining Synagogues in the Muslim World

Photos of the Last Remaining Synagogues in the Muslim World

Photos of the Last Remaining Synagogues in the Muslim World

11 beautiful photos of shuls that were once home to thriving Jewish communities.
by Hyacinth Mascarenhas
Faith has long inspired some of the most remarkable architecture around the world.
In Judaism, the synagogue is seen as more than just a physical building: It is a central address and institution for the expression of Jewish identity and traditions, embedded in the social fabric of Jewish communities.
These synagogues were once scattered across the Middle East and North Africa and were home to thriving and flourishing Jewish populations, some dating back to ancient times. Since the creation of Israel in 1948 and the 1967 Six-Day War, however, these numbers have dwindled due to persecution and subsequent emigration, leaving behind only a few thousand Jews in the Arab world. Small clusters of Jews can still be found in Muslim-majority countries, including Egypt, Lebanon, Iran and Tunisia.
Along with this diaspora, the few remaining synagogues stand as reminders of the once-thriving Jewish populations in Muslim-majority countries and offer us a glimpse into the unique Arab-Jewish identity in the Middle East.
We’ve compiled a list of some of the most gorgeous synagogues and temples in Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East, spanning from Iran to Morocco:

1. Eliyahu Hanavi Sephardic, Egypt

Eliyahu Hanavi Sephardic, Egypt

Eliyahu Hanavi Sephardic, Egypt
The 150-year-old Eliyahu Hanavi Sephardic synagogue in Alexandria, Egypt, is one of the largest synagogues in the Middle East and boasts towering Italian marble columns and seating for more than 700 people, offering us a unique glimpse into what the once-vibrant Jewish community was like in its prime.

2. Ashkenazi Synagogue, Turkey

Ashkenazi Synagogue, Turkey
Ashkenazi Synagogue, TurkeyVia: Wikimedia
Designed by Italian architect Gabriel Tedeschi, Ashkenazi Synagogue is located in Istanbul, Turkey, and was opened in 1900 for Jewish immigrants from Poland and Macedonia. The wooden black ark is carved with letters of the Hebrew alphabet and was brought from Kiev. It is also the country’s only Ashkenazi synagogue.
3. Slat Alfassiyine, Morocco

Slat Alfassiyine, Morocco
Slat Alfassiyine, MoroccoVia: Francois Munier
Located in Fez, Morocco, one of the world’s oldest medieval cities, this 17th-century synagogue was reopened early last year following a two-year restoration project. It is an “eloquent testimony to the spiritual wealth and diversity of the Kingdom of Morocco and its heritage,” according to Moroccan King Mohammed VI.
Islamist Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane represented King Mohammed VI in an inauguration ceremony marking the completion of a 17th century synagogue restoration project in Fez yesterday.
In 2011, when a new constitution was adapted, the king said that Jewish places of worship throughout Morocco should be restored, even as the Arab spring roared across North Africa.The newly renovated Slat Alfassiyine synagogue in the heart of one of the world’s oldest medieval cities, the country’s cultural and spiritual nucleus, symbolizes how seriously he took that mandate.
4. Shaar Hashomayim, Egypt

Shaar Hashomayim, Egypt
Shaar Hashomayim, Egypt
One of the largest Jewish temples in Egypt, the Shaar Hashomayim synagogue, which means “Gates of Heaven,” was built in 1905. Also known as Adly Street Temple and Ismailiya Temple, the architecture of this synagogue resembles ancient Egyptian temples, and is engraved with lotus flowers and plants on its outer walls.
5. Temple Beth-El, Morocco

Temple Beth-El, Morocco
Temple Beth-El, MoroccoVia: Brian
Located in Casablanca, Morocco, Temple Beth-El is one of the largest synagogues in the country, and is the religious and social center of the city’s Jewish community.
6. Neve Shalom, Turkey

Neve Shalom, Turkey
Neve Shalom, TurkeyVia: Anita Gould
Dating back to the 1930s, Neve Shalom, which means “Oasis of Peace,” is Istanbul’s largest synagogue. Tragically, it has also been the target of numerous brutal attacks by anti-Jewish extremists in recent decades.
7. Magen Abraham, Lebanon

Magen Abraham, Lebanon
Magen Abraham, LebanonVia: Ted Swedenburg
This building is the last remaining synagogue in Beirut, Lebanon. After the last rabbi departed in 1975, the synagogue suffered severe structural damage during Lebanon’s 1975-90 civil war. However, repairs began in 2009 and the interior has now been restored to its original state, with sky-blue walls and arched windows.
8. El Ghriba, Tunisia

El Ghriba, Tunisia
El Ghriba, TunisiaVia: Pietro Izzo
Believed to date back almost 1,900 years, the El Ghriba synagogue in Tunisia, 500 kilometers south of Tunis, is Africa’s oldest synagogue. Last year the synagogue hosted hundreds of Jews from Europe, Israel and Africa in a three-day pilgrimage guarded by armed Tunisian police.
9. Zarzis Synagogue, Tunisia

Zarzis Synagogue, Tunisia
Zarzis Synagogue, TunisiaVia: Wikimedia
Home to a small Jewish community of around 100 people, this synagogue is located in Zarzis, Tunisia. Built in the early 20th century, the building was once host to a community of about 1,000 people. In 1982 the synagogue was torched shortly after the Israeli occupation of Lebanon, and the community’s Torah scrolls were destroyed before the building was restored.
Zarzis is home to a Jewish community of around 100 people, all living in the Jewish quarter of the city near the central market.
Many have jewelry shops and run other businesses such as carpentry and the Shimon Haddad and sons general store, the shop sells natural remedies and other miscellaneous products.
The community is served by the Zarzis Synagogue, built in the early 20th century to host the local Jewish community that numbered approximately1000 people at the time.
The synagogue was subject to an arson attack in 1982 that followed the Israeli incursion into Lebanon before it was restored to its original status. Prayers are read in the synagogue every Saturday morning and the synagogue hosts a Yeshiva, a Jewish Torah learning school during the week. The synagogue has a distinctive Andalusian architectural style.
10. Pol-e-Choubi Synagogue, Iran

Pol-e-Choubi Synagogue, Iran
Pol-e-Choubi Synagogue, Iran
Iran’s population of 75 million includes about 20,000 Jews, the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside Israel. The Pol-e-Choubi synagogue in located in Tehran, Iran.
11. Ben Ezra, Egypt

Ben Ezra, Egypt
Ben Ezra, EgyptVia: girlenchanted
Located in Old Cairo, the Ben Ezra was not only an important center of prayer and celebration for Jews in Egypt since the 10th century. Often referred to as El-Geniza Synagogue, it was also site of the 19th-century discovery of the Cairo Geniza, considered to be “the most important source for understanding daily religious, communal and intellectual life around the Mediterranean during the medieval period.”
According to local legend, the synagogue is said to be built on the exact place where Moses was found near the river shore.

Segun tomado de, http://www.aish.com/jw/s/Photos-of-the-Last-Remaining-Synagogues-in-the-Muslim-World.html el jueves, 4 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 4, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

¿Debo perdonar a todos?

¿Debo perdonar a todos?
Pregunta:

¿Cómo puedo perdonar a alguien que me lastimo profundamente, especialmente alguien cercano en el quien yo confiaba?

Respuesta:

El arte de perdonar no es una acción solitaria que se empieza y finaliza en un lapso corto de tiempo. Poder perdonar es un proceso muy complejo y largo, en donde vamos progresando lentamente hacia la meta.

En un ensayo sobre este tema, el Rebe de Lubavitch explicó que hay tres niveles de perdón:

1) No le deseamos al otro ningún mal, y hasta llegamos a rezar por su bienestar. En este nivel de perdón, podemos seguir un poco enojados, sentirnos heridos y hasta incluso furiosos. Pero aún así, sentimos que no deseamos desearle ningún mal a la persona y no queremos tomar ningún tipo de venganza.

2) No estamos más enojados. En este segundo nivel, podemos no estar preparados para relacionarnos con esa persona como antes, pero podemos seguir adelante y dejar fluir hasta el punto que no guardamos ningún sentimiento de enojo y rencor.

3) Retomar la amistad. En este nivel, el perdón es completo. No solo hemos perdonado al individuo, sino también, lo hemos entendido y re aceptado otra vez. Ahora estamos listos para ser tan cercanos a esta persona como en los viejos tiempos.

El Talmud explica que si incluso si alguien nos ha herido terriblemente, se espera de nosotros encontrar las fuerzas para perdonarlo incluso al primer nivel.La ausencia de cualquier perdón es un símbolo de crueldad. Desearle el mal a alguien y el deseo de venganza, respresentan una debilidad en la personalidad que requiere de rectificación.

Una forma más complicada de perdón es el segundo nivel, en donde cesamos el sentirnos dolidos o enojados. Si nos han herido o engañado, tenemos que tener tiempo y ardua labor en quitarnos estos negativos sentimientos. Puede ser un largo proceso de curación hasta que estos sentimientos puedan desaparecer por completo de nuestro corazón y nuestra alma.

La forma ideal de perdonar es el tercer nivel en donde retomamos la amistad. Como sea, debe recalcarse que esto no es siempre posible. Algunas relaciones son tan tóxicas que lo más responsable en este caso es alejarse de ellas. Pero no debemos tener un enfoque de “o todo o nada”. Si retomar la amistad es imposible, no es siempre necesario cortar todo tipo de contacto o convertirse en antagónico. Podemos alcanzar un nivel más básico de perdón deseándole al otro todo lo mejor. Podemos parar de estar enojados con ellos, y darles un básico de respeto. Podemos seguir saludándolos cuando los vemos y darles la dignidad que todo ser humano merece.

Cada avance pequeño en nuestra relación es significante, tiene un profundo afecto y genera alegría.

Toma el primer paso ahora.

POR MIJOEL GOURARIE
El rabino Mijoel Gourarie, dicta clases sobre una amplia gama de temas, con especial énfasis en el crecimiento personal y la autoayuda, incluyendo el fortalecimiento de la autoestima, y la creación d buenas relaciones. Es el director del instituto “Bina” en Sydney, Australia.
Segun tomado de, http://www.es.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1378267/jewish/Debo-perdonar-a-todos.htm el jueves, 4 de dic. de 2014.
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 4, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Archaeologist Cracks Mysterious Message on Jerusalem Prison Wall

Archaeologist cracks mysterious message on Jerusalem prison wall
An Israeli archaeologist set out to find the Jewish fighter who left behind an inscription at Jerusalem’s Kishle prison. What he found dates back to the 8th century BCE — the First Temple period.
By Judy Maltz | Dec. 3, 2014 | 11:14 AM

Yehoshua Matza
Shmuel Matza Photo by Emil Salman

Courtesy of the Tower of David Museum
The Kishle prison, then Photo by Courtesy of the Tower of David Museum
As a 20-year-old member of the pre-state Jewish underground, Shmuel Matza spent four days incarcerated in the Kishle, a prison right near Jerusalem’s Old City walls.

But he made sure that evidence of his brief stay there would remain for posterity.

In a symbolic act of defiance, Matza, a commander in the Irgun at the time, etched his name into the wall of the prison, and beside it, the emblem of his militant anti-British organization – a hand clenching a gun running across a map of Greater Israel with the words “only thus” written beneath it.

These inscriptions are still discernible at the entrance to the facility, recently opened for public tours by the Tower of David Museum. (English-language tours of the site are scheduled to begin on December 19.) Beyond the peeled prison walls, the site includes excavations of remains that archeologists say date back as far as the First Temple period.

“I etched these inscriptions into the wall with a fork because they wouldn’t provide us with knives there,” recalls 87-year-old Matza, who still carries vivid memories of those days. “There were about 20 of us packed into one jail cell. There were fleas and lice, and it smelled pretty awful. We’d go out to the patio for our meals, which consisted of olives, yogurt, pita bread and tea. I still remember that they served the tea in these aluminum cups which got so hot that it burned our mouths when we drank from them.”

 

The Tower of David Museum Courtesy of Tower of David Museum

It was Amit Re’em, a young archeologist with the Israel Antiquities Authority, who set out to find the young prisoner who had etched his name into the wall when he began excavating the site almost 15 years ago and discovered the inscription.

“I knew that there was a Yehoshua Matza [a well-known Likud politician], so I though this might be a relative,” recalls Re’em. “I called him, and indeed, it turned out that Yehoshua was his younger brother. So I immediately picked up the phone and called Shmuel.”

Built in the 1830s, the Kishle was originally used as a military compound by the Ottomans. During the British Mandate period, it served as a police station and jail. Matza was among the many Jewish underground activists held there under administrative detention.

The inscription, now open to the public Courtesy Tower of David Museum

He grew up barely a few hundred meters away in the neighborhood of Yemin Moshe overlooking the Hinnom Valley, one of four brothers. His older brother had joined the pre-state Haganah, which eventually formed the core of the IDF after Israel gained independence, while he enlisted in the more militant Irgun (also known as Etzel) underground, and his younger brother Yehoshua – later to serve several terms as a Likud Knesset member, including one as health minister, before being appointed president of the Israel Bonds organization – joined the even more radical Lehi. “We had one other brother, but my father insisted that he stay behind and mind the homefront,” recounts Matza wryly.

In 1947, two years after he joined the Irgun, Matza was apprehended by British officers who suspected he was illegally hoarding weapons. After four days in transit at Kishle, he was transferred to the much bigger Latrun prison, where he spent the next eight months before joining Israeli forces in the War of Independence.

Like many of his fellow prisoners, Matza had no idea about the archeological treasure trove lying beneath the floor of his jail cell. It would take several decades before the excavation of the site would begin.

“In this one concentrated space, you have the entire history of Jerusalem,” notes Re’em, who today serves as Jerusalem District Archeologist for the Israel Antiquities Authority. “Layer upon layer of it, starting with the British Mandate period and going down all the way to the 8th century BCE, the First Temple period.”

The Kishle prison, then Courtesy of the Tower of David Museum

One level below the prison, Re’em and his team found remnants of fabric-dying basins dating back to the Crusader era. Beneath that, they discovered a water drainage channel assumed to have belonged to Herod’s palace, and further below, the foundations of the palace, which archeologists believe extended as far as Mount Zion. Under these foundations, they discovered remains of a Hasmonean-era wall dating back to the end of the first century, and at the very bottom, remnants of another wall believed to have been built by King Hezekiah about 900 years earlier.

“Nowhere in Jerusalem do we have remnants of so many different periods in history in one small space,” notes Re’em.

Spending a few days on top of thousands of years of history has apparently provided Matza with a unique perspective on old age. With almost nine decades on earth behind him, he doesn’t think twice about heading out every morning to his law practice in downtown Jerusalem, where he says he still gets great satisfaction preparing for court battles.

“What am I going to do at home?” he asks. “At work I get to cross-examine people, I get to shout at other lawyers and to argue with the judge. At home, there’s just my wife to fight with. And I know that with her I’m always going to lose.”

Segun tomado de, http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-features/.premium-1.629716 el miércoles, 3 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 3, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Who Are the Real Racists in Israel?

Who Are the Real Racists in Israel?

NOVEMBER 27, 2014 

Author:

avatarChloe Valdary

Nineteen-year-old Israeli Eden Attias dreamed of becoming a DJ one day. His special knack for mastering electronics and technology attracted the attention of the Ordnance Corps of the IDF, who recruited him for basic training in November 2013. But this position with the Israeli army would never be fulfilled. As Attias closed his eyes to sleep on a bus with his fellow soldiers in Nazareth one fateful Wednesday morning, he had no idea that he would never wake up. As the bus rolled to a stop in Afula, Israel, a Palestinian terrorist boarded, pulled out a knife, and stabbed Attias several times in the neck and chest area. Aspiring to one day fill the world with music, Attias would instead succumb to his wounds and die an untimely death.

Attias’ story is sadly not an anomaly; Jews commuting on buses and in cars are frequently attacked by Palestinian terrorists throughout Israel, creating headlines that play across Israeli news television screens all too often.

This political landscape wherein Palestinian extremists see fit to attack Jews going about their daily work serves as the primer for the rationale behind Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon’s proposed security measure to compel citizens of the Palestinian areas who work in Israel to “return through the same crossing they left so there will be supervision of entry and departure like in any sovereign country that protects itself and takes care to admit foreign residents into its territory in orderly fashion.”

According to Ya’alon, the policy does not ban Israelis and Palestinians from riding the same busses. Instead, it compels Palestinians to exit through the same checkpoint through which they entered, namely the Eyal checkpoint. This will enable the IDF to “better account for the thousands of Palestinian laborers who enter Israel on a daily basis by tracking their return back to the West Bank.”

To be sure, the pragmatics of this security policy must and should be debated and discussed by Israeli policy makers in the Knesset; that is what democracies do. Yet it must be stressed that this policy does not come out of a vacuum. As noted above, it comes out of a pattern of repeated incidents of aggression towards Jews; any debate must bear these conditions in mind.

But context is a foreign concept to J Street U leaders Catie Stewart and Gabriel Erbs, who describe the policy in a Haaretz article as “segregation” and an act of “denying Palestinian civil rights and self-determination.” In a hit piece published on November 4, Stewart and Erbs invoke the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King to suggest that policy makers trying to protect Jews from racist attacks are themselves guilty of racism.

“The idea of segregated buses should send chills down the spine of anyone who has ever … learned about … the segregated Jim Crow-era American south,” they write, after describing Ya’alon as a bloodthirsty fiend who wants to end the “Palestinian cancer” with “chemotherapy.” Yet both accusations are disingenuous. Yet Ya’alon clearly says, “We do not have intentions to annihilate them [the Palestinians] and we have also expressed readiness to grant them a state, whereas they are unwilling to recognize our right to exist here as a Jewish state.”

Moreover, creating a different bus route so as to deter attacks on Jews is no more “segregationist” than blacks refusing to go through an all-white neighborhood for fear of a lynch mob in the 1950s. Heaven forfend they should value their lives and take reasonable precautions so as to prevent beatings, raping, stabbings, and hangings. No, no, that would be a form of self-imposed “segregation,” a systematic disparaging of white people that should be publicly denounced by human rights folk everywhere.

Unfortunately, in Stewart and Erbs’s world, inversion is in vogue. Protection from racists becomes racism and a person’s right to defend himself is eroded, turning victims into victimizers.

To make matters worse, Stewart and Erb represent an organization that has no qualms about preventing Jewish communities from being established in the West Bank. According to J Street’s website, the very presence of Jewish communities, “undermines the prospects for peace by making Palestinians doubt Israeli motives and commitment.” Erb specifically writes in The Jewish Week that Jewish communities, “fuel inter-group tensions.” To wit, according to Erb, the presence of Jews in certain areas is itself a provocation; it is Jews who are responsible for the incitement against them.

That Stewart and Erb arrogate to themselves the authority to give commentary on the issue of “segregation” when they actively advocate for the establishment of a state which, according to them, must segregate Jews before it comes into fruition, illustrates the absurdity of their own hypocrisy.

And this is what their appraisal of Israeli policy ultimately boils down to: an excess of hyper-idealistic solipsism whereby members of a mutual admiration society think that referencing the name of a prominent civil rights leader means they are just like them. Yet, Dr. King understood fundamentally that a persecuted people will grow tired; they will grow tired of being pelted with stones; they will grow tired of having their children run over with cars; they will grow tired of having their soldiers stabbed to death while they sleep. “So in the midst of their tiredness, these people … rise up and protest against injustice.”

Security officials say that this policy seeks to address that injustice. Perhaps it isn’t the right one; perhaps it is. But one thing is certain: Stewart and Erb’s faux righteous indignation is categorically not.

Segun tomado de, http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/11/27/who-are-the-real-racists-in-israel/ el martes, 2 de dic. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 2, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Reflections on the UN Partition of Palestine

Reflections on the UN Partition of Palestine

NOVEMBER 30, 2014 2:40 PM

The day was November 29, 1947, the time, 5:50 p.m. EST. The United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution that would divide the Land of Israel between a Jewish and Arab state. Thirty-three nations voted in favor, thirteen in opposition, and ten abstained. The UN would recognize a small, but nonetheless imminent Jewish State following the British evacuation on May 14, 1948.

With the long awaited prospect of Jewish Statehood now a reality, the Jews rejoiced and danced throughout that night. People embraced and wished each other ‘mazal tov.’ David Ben Gurion, at a gathering at the Jewish Agency in Jerusalem, called for everyone gathered to sing the Hatikvah. Jewish Agency official Golda Meyerson (Meir) announced to those Holocaust survivors still languishing in DP camps in Europe that “together with us, you will live in a free Jewish state.” According to the UN Resolution, the Jews would soon receive a small sliver of land consisting of the Negev Desert, the coast and parts of the Galilee region – about 12 percent of the original Jewish home called for by the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Jerusalem was designated to be an international city. Yet, as Jews of the Yishuv celebrated and danced horas, their very lives were in jeopardy.

The Arabs strongly rejected Resolution 181 and made it abundantly clear that they had no intention to abide by the resolution. This came as no surprise. Since the 1917 Balfour Declaration, Arab opposition to a Jewish State of any size was made known by word and deed in the form of terror in the ensuing decades. In the early days of the British Mandate, Jews issued manifestos and made overtures calling for cooperation with their Arab neighbors, hoping that they could build the region together as neighbors, but to no avail.

Those Arab leaders who condemned the waves of violence against Jews or supported a Jewish state were dealt with in the harshest ways.

On November 29, Arab UN delegations called the UN move ‘undemocratic.’ Ambassador Amir Arslan of Syria, proclaimed, “My country will never recognize such a decision,” Jamali of Iraq objected that Resolution 181, “Undermines peace, justice and democracy,” and they and their Arab colleagues abruptly walked out the halls of the UN in Lake Success, New York, in protest. Almost immediately, Arab labor strikes in Palestine were called, and acts of terror were launched against Jews.

In the first month after the UN vote, 118 Jews were killed and 217 were wounded. Civilians were attacked on the streets, and convoys to cities were also attacked as were medical clinics. Violence also extended into the Arab world. In the Yemenite city of Aden, anti-Jewish riots broke out with reports of 76 Jews killed and 74 wounded.

Soon, the Arab Legion of irregular troops led by Nazi trained commandoes Hassam Salameh and Abdul Kader Husseini, nephew of the infamous Mufti, Haj Amin Al Husseini, led the Arab war effort while the surrounding Arab nations preferred to wait until the British evacuation. On February 11, a bombing on Ben Yehudah Street in central Jerusalem killed and wounded hundreds.

The Jewish State, not even officially re-born, was fighting for its existence.

Resolution 181 represented the rebirth of the Jewish State and also a blow to the proposed two state solution. The Palestinian Arabs rejected an Arab as well as a Jewish State and sought to eliminate Israel, demonstrating that they were far more anti-Jewish than they were ‘pro-Palestinian.’

Sixty-seven years later, Israel thrives but still faces many foes in the Middle East and emerging foes in Europe and other places. These opponents of Israel, like the rejectionists before them, oppose not the borders, but the very notion of Jewish Statehood. Time has passed but the enmity remains.

Segun tomado de, http://www.algemeiner.com/2014/11/30/reflections-on-the-un-partition-of-palestine/ el domingo, 30 de nov. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 30, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

¿Convivencia o coexistencia? (Segunda Parte)

¿Convivencia o coexistencia? (Segunda Parte)

Por Elena Ruth Gómez*

Los pocos que quedaron en la aljama fueron expulsados de Granada. El rey al-Mutammid de Sevilla los acogió nombrando a Isaac Ibn Albalia como rabino mayor de todo su reino con la orden de restaurar la Escuela que hubiese en Granada.
Ibn Negrella dejó a su hijo una aljama grande y próspera con un naguid (gobernador) como visir al frente de ella y en 1162, los pocos que quedaban, convertidos a la fuerza al Islam por los almorávides, fueron aplastados por los almohades. Obligados a vestir de azul y gorro amarillo, dejaron de montar a caballo y vestir de seda. Se calcula que en 1492 apenas si había un millar de judíos en Granada.
El contrapunto a Granada lo hallamos en la Taifa de Zaragoza. Allí encontramos a otro de los maestros de Lucena, Jonah ibn Yanah junto a Moses ibn Samuel haCohen ibn Chikatilia.
La judería de Zaragoza prospera y junto al rey al-Mundhir encontramos a un ministro judío, Yekutiel ibn Hasan. No será el único, posteriormente encontraremos Abu Fadl Ibn Hasdai asesorando al rey. El vigor de la aljama llegará hasta el siglo XV.
Es significativo que el Siglo de Oro de la literatura hebrea medieval se concentre en esta taifa. Por ella no solo pasó el Cid luchando bajo bandera de los Banu Hud si no que su situación estratégica entre Castilla, Aragón y los Condados Catalanes, le propició una paz debidamente administrada por su diplomacia. Y es aquí, en este siglo XI tan tempestuoso, donde encontramos a sus principales representantes.
La obra de Salomón Ibn Gabirol es la expresión mística de la poesía religiosa. Escrita en árabe, expresará un saber teológico que influirá en los grandes maestros cristianos posteriores, siendo el Avicebrón de los escolásticos. Ibn Ezra nos dice que murió en Lucena hacia 1050.  Los traductores Judah ibn Tibbon y Shemtob Ibn Falaquera se ocuparon de hacernos llegar sus obras. Sus Azarot son exposiciones sobre los 613 preceptos. Una de ellas se utiliza en el servicio de Shavuot. Pero si su Fons Vitae fue libro de cabecera para los escolásticos, para la comunidad judía lo fue el Keter Malkhut (Corona Real). Es su máxima obra poética y es un canto a D-os y a la Creación. Se recita después del servicio vespertino de Yom Kippur.
Josef Ibn Paquda (1040-1110) fue Dayan (juez rabínico) en Zaragoza. Su obra principal, Hobot ha-lebabot, escrita en árabe, nos llega en hebreo gracias de nuevo a la traducción de Tibbon. En su tratado, dentro de la mística hebrea, nos dice Ibn Paquda que el peligro a que debe hacer frente un alma piadosa consiste en la rutina y el anquilosamiento. El remedio no es otro que fortalecer el espíritu para que pueda vivir sin peligro dentro del mundo. Las obligaciones de la Ley son beneficios que el hombre ha recibido del Creador.
Por último, el más rompedor, Yehuda Ha-Levi (1075-1141). Aunque nació en Tudela, este médico trotamundos vivió en Zaragoza. Incansable viajero, conoció tanto el territorio musulmán como el cristiano para decir: “curo a Babel pero ella sigue siendo miserable”.
Jerusalén siempre fue su meta. Se veía a sí mismo como un desterrado obligado a vivir lejos de su patria. Hacia 1120 escribía a su amigo David de Narbona: “Suspiro por el instante en qu D-os me de libertad para irme a los lugares en donde se halla la ciencia vivificante y las fuentes de la sabiduría”.
Su final no puede ser más legendario. Se dice que un jinete árabe le asesinó cuando, frente a los muros de Jerusalén, recitaba su Elegía por Sión. En esos momentos, Jerusalén era la capital del reino cruzado.
Se cree que él fue el autor del cuento de “Los Tres Anillos” y es el primer poeta en el que se encuentran versos en castellano. Casi toda su obra está escrita en hebreo y se puede decir que con él termina la influencia árabe en la cultura hebrea, iniciando así un nacionalismo israelita con un único fin: Jerusalén. Para ha-Levi, la nación judía y la tierra prometida forman un todo completo. El retorno a Jerusalén es una necesidad imprescindible, un mandato.
Su obra más conocida es el Kadosh de la Amidá para Yom Kippur “El Himno de la Creación”.
“Prueba y fundamento de la religión menospreciada” fue su libro más famoso aunque no fue conocido con este largo título si no con el de “Kuzarí”, pues se presenta como un diálogo entre un rabino y el rey de los Kházaros.
La llegada de los almorávides a finales del siglo XI significó una vuelta a la ortodoxia musulmana llena de intransigencia y más dificultades para la comunidad judía, que cada vez más emigraba a un norte auspiciado por los reyes cristianos.
El saber talmúdico tendió a concentrarse en Lucena con Ibn Hasdai e Ibn Gayat a la cabeza. Se pagó una muy considerable suma de dinero a los almorávides para seguir subsistiendo, algo que los almohades en 1148 no toleraron. Al morir el último de los gaones babilónicos a principios de siglo, Lucena se convirtió en la directora espiritual del judaísmo con Isaac al-Fasí como director de la Escuela.

Llegado este punto es justo nombrar a los hermanos ibn Ezra. Abraham ibn Ezra (1089-1164), fue, con sus estudios astronómicos, uno de los científicos más influyentes de la Edad Media. Mosés ibn Ezra nos dejó su “Sirat Yisrael”, un análisis de la literatura hebrea hasta sus días.  Las persecuciones a las que fueron sometidas la población judía bajo el emir ibn Tashfin contrastan con el favorecimiento de su hijo Alí, lo que permitió que en la primera mitad del siglo XII una segunda generación de eruditos: al-Balia e ibn Zadik entre otros. Pero es en estos momentos cuando se debe hacer frente a otro problema: el de los conversos, teniendo como exponente a Moses ha-Sefardí, llamado luego Pedro Alfonso, que atacará al judaísmo con fervor.

Convertirse o perecer

La entrada de los almohades supuso una catástrofe tanto para judíos como mozárabes, según nos informa Salomón Ibn Verga y la Crónica Adephonsi. Convertirse o perecer, esa era la consigna.
Muchas familias, como la de Maimónides, fingieron una conversión al Islam a la espera de un cambio o la posibilidad de emigrar. Ante el celo con que se vigilaba las conversiones muchos optaron por emigrar al norte cristiano, como los Tibbon o los Qimhi. La plaza de Calatrava, entregada por Alfonso VII a un sobrino de Ibn Ezra se convirtió en centro de distribución de los emigrados, dirigiéndose muchos de ellos a Toledo, Aragón, Castilla, Cataluña, Provenza y Egipto.
A lo largo de este artículo hemos recorrido cinco siglos de historia de la comunidad judía bajo el dominio musulmán. Hemos visto gloria y esplendor pero también muerte y aflicción. Una comunidad en donde muchos vivían en condiciones mucho menos brillantes al estarles prohibidas, como a todos los no musulmanes, el ejercicio del poder político y respetando así el pacto de la Dhimma, aunque, como hemos dicho al principio, no siempre se cumplía la ley. Hemos hablado de los grandes personajes, visires y embajadores, sabios y poetas, médicos y grandes hombres de negocios, pero no podemos olvidarnos nunca de ese groso de población, en su mayoría agricultores y artesanos, que hicieron de las aljamas un lugar próspero, en donde generación tras generación se transmitía el judaísmo, resistiendo incluso en los tiempos difíciles. Unas aljamas de las que hoy en día nos sentimos orgullosos.  Domínguez Ortiz dijo en 1992: “No es verdad que hubiera previamente una etapa de convivencia ideal. La convivencia medieval entre las distintas razas y religiones fue más bien una difícil coexistencia. Pintar como un hogar feliz la Granada nazarí es un completo error; allí los judíos eran pocos y descalificados y los únicos cristianos eran los que estaban en las mazmorras.”
Por ello, he querido terminar con un sabio que refleja en su vida y su persona toda la historia judía. Fue hecho musulmán a la fuerza pero su familia nunca abandonó la fe hebraica, huyó de al-Andalus a Fez, en donde el rabino secreto de la comunidad judía, Judah ibn Susán, fue descubierto y ejecutado. El sabio, huido de nuevo, gracias a un amigo árabe, recaló en San Juan de Acre. El rey Ricardo I de Inglaterra quiso que fuera su médico personal pero prefirió serlo de Saladino, bajo cuya protección pudo despojarse de su apariencia musulmana y gritar a los cuatro vientos que era judío y sefardí.  Nasí (presidente) de los judíos de Egipto, en su tumba en Tiberiades se escribió: “de Moses a Moses nadie hubo semejante a Moses”.
Por supuesto, ya saben de quien les hablo, de Rabí Moses ibn Maimon, Maimónides.
Su obra más famosa fue escrita en 1190, “Guía de los perplejos” e inmediatamente traducida al hebreo por el insigne Samuel ibn Tibbon. Para Maimónides, “perplejo” es el estudioso que al obtener cierto grado de conocimiento se desconcierta por las aparentes contradicciones entre su fe y su razón. Para él, la inteligencia de la realidad debía ayudar al hombre en el cumplimiento de los preceptos, pues según el historiador S. Zeitlin, sostenía el valor universal de la Ley Mosaica y la firme obligación del Pueblo de Israel de conservarla.
Sabio controvertido ya en su época, sus obras se escribían en árabe aunque él se declarase sefardí y, a pesar del rechazo y la controversia que generó en ciertos sectores de la intelectualidad judía en su momento, sus obras sobre Medicina sirvieron a generaciones de médicos y su doctrina, expuesta en su “Mishné Torá” se incorporó a la liturgia de las sinagogas sefardíes.
Finalmente, me gustaría terminar con unas palabras de Maimónides y que reflejan mi humilde pretensión al escribir este artículo:
“El recto saber del hombre, ayudado por su razón, debe conducir a éste hacia D-os”*Licenciada en Historia por la Universidad de Murcia


BIBLIOGRAFIA
. BAER, I, “History of the Jews in Christian Spain”
. MITRE FERNANDEZ, E. “Cristianos, musulmanes y hebreos: la difícil convivencia de la España medieval”. Madrid, Anaya 1988
.“La España Medieval: sociedades, estados, culturas” .Madrid Istmo, 1980
. PEREZ, J. “Los judíos en España”, Marcial Pons Historia, 2005
. SUAREZ FERNANDEZ, L. “Judíos españoles en la Edad Media”, de. Rialp, 1980
.“Los judíos” Ariel, 2003
ZEITLIN, S., “Maimónides” NY, 1955.

Segun tomado de, http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Mundo_Judio/61629/ el domingo, 30 de nov. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 30, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

A 66 años de la resolución de la partición de Palestina de las Naciones Unidas

A 66 años de la resolución de la partición de Palestina de las Naciones Unidas

El 29 de noviembre (fecha conocida en hebreo como Caf Tet beNovember) se cumplió el 66 aniversario de la resolución 181 de partición de Palestina de las Naciones Unidas, por la que se decidió crear un estado judío y otro árabe. También, hoy se cumple el aniversario del 30 de noviembre de 1947, día en que estalló la guerra civil entre los judíos y los árabes en el Mandato Británico de Palestina, como así también la expulsión de los ciudadanos judíos de los países árabes.

La guerra continuaría durante cinco meses, transformándose en la Guerra de la Independencia, cuando el régimen del Mandato terminó definitivamente la medianoche 14 de mayo 1948, y el Estado de Israel, comenzó formalmente a existir.

Aunque las hostilidades existían antes y continuaron durante décadas, el detonante inmediato de la guerra civil fue la resolución de partición. El Plan de Partición propuso dividir el territorio – que había estado bajo gobierno británico desde 1920 – en un estado judío y árabe, con Jerusalén bajo un régimen internacional especial.

Los británicos, que aún se recuperaban de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, estaban dispuestos a salir pero poco dispuestos a intervenir en la escalada de violencia.
La mayoría de los judíos celebraron la resolución, pero los árabes palestinos y los estados árabes rechazaron la partición. Al día siguiente, el 30 de noviembre de 1947, el Alto Comité Árabe, que actuó como órgano de gobierno de los árabes de Palestina, llamó a protestas y una huelga. Hombres armados emboscaron a dos autobuses judíos cerca de la ciudad de Petah Tikva, matando a siete personas, y francotiradores árabes dispararon contra los autobuses y peatones en Haifa, Jerusalén y Tel Aviv. La guerra civil había comenzado. En ese momento, había más de 600.000 judíos y alrededor de 1.340.000 árabes en Palestina.

La resolución de la partición

La resolución pedía una división del Mandato de Palestina en dos estados, uno judío y otro árabe. El plan de partición se discutió por primera vez en la escena internacional en la década de 1930, sugerido por las conclusiones de la Comisión Peel, una delegación de investigación británica que fue enviada a la Palestina del Mandato para analizar la situación tras la violencia entre judíos y árabes.

La comisión Peel llegó a la conclusión de que la continuación del Mandato Británico no era beneficiosa y recomendó entonces dividir la tierra en tres partes, dejando una zona a permanecer bajo el dominio británico.

Las recomendaciones de la Comisión Peel fueron rechazadas por ambas partes, judía y árabe, aunque las discusiones sobre el asunto continuaron. Al final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, después de las revelaciones del Holocausto, los Estados Unidos presionaron al Reino Unido en relación con el Plan de Partición.

Una vez que los británicos habían cedido ante las demandas y presiones, las Naciones Unidas crearon un nuevo comité – el Comité Especial de las Naciones Unidas sobre Palestina (UNSCOP) – bajo cuyas recomendaciones la ONU votó la partición el 29 de noviembre.

El importante rol de las diplomacias latinoamericanas

Las diplomacias latinoamericanas desempeñaron, en particular, un papel decisivo en la resolución 181 de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas (AGNU) sobre la partición de Palestina en dos Estados, uno judío y otro árabe (nov. 1947). El peso numérico de los Estados latinoamericanos (un tercio de los miembros) y el rol central de la AGNU otorgaron a los representantes latinoamericanos una responsabilidad histórica en uno de los problemas más espinosos que ha tenido que tratar la comunidad internacional. Las naciones europeo-occidentales, junto con Estados Unidos, sumaron 12 países que votaron a favor, mientras que los países latinoamericanos, sumaron trece. En el resto del mundo, cada zona obtuvo muy escasos votos a favor, alrededor de uno o dos (Europa del Este, cinco, África, dos, Asia Pacífico, uno).

Votaciones según países:
Los 33 países (58%) que votaron a favor de la resolución 181 fueron: Australia, Bélgica, Bielorrusia, Bolivia, Brasil, Canadá, Checoslovaquia, Costa Rica, Dinamarca, República Dominicana, Ecuador, Estados Unidos, Filipinas, Francia, Guatemala, Haití, Holanda, Islandia, Liberia, Luxemburgo, Nueva Zelanda, Nicaragua, Noruega, Panamá, Paraguay, Perú, Polonia, Suecia, Sudáfrica, URSS, Ucrania, Uruguay y Venezuela.
Los 13 países (23%) que votaron contra la Resolución 181 fueron: Afganistán, Arabia Saudí, Cuba, Egipto, Grecia, India, Irán, Irak, Líbano, Pakistán, Siria, Turquía y Yemen.
Los países que se abstuvieron fueron 10 (el 18%): Argentina, Colombia, Chile, China, El Salvador, Etiopía, Honduras, México, Reino Unido y Yugoslavia. Tailandia estuvo ausente en la sesión plenaria.

En los debates previos al voto, los embajadores Pedro Zuloaga de Venezuela, Jorge García Granados de Guatemala, Enrique Rodríguez Fabregat de Uruguay y Oswaldo Aranha de Brasil – este último como Presidente de la AGNU – fueron particularmente activos en la defensa de la creación del Estado judío, incluyendo su postura en la UNSCOP a favor de la necesidad del pueblo judío de un refugio nacional ante su persecución.

Por cierto, seis Estados latinoamericanos se abstuvieron (Argentina, Chile, Colombia, El Salvador, Honduras y México) y uno se opuso (Cuba). Cualquiera haya sido su voto en la resolución 181, a principios de la década del 1950, toda Latinoamérica había iniciado formalmente relaciones diplomáticas con el Estado judío. En un contexto de radical rechazo de la existencia de Israel por parte de los palestinos y otros árabes, las posiciones latinoamericanas adoptadas entre 1947 y 1967 pueden por lo tanto ser consideradas como más bien favorables a Israel, y eso a pesar de la retórica pro-equilibrio y pro-imparcialidad de la mayoría de ellos.

Algunos cambios comenzaron a surgir, sin embargo, a mediados de los años 1960. La entrada masiva de países descolonizados de África y Asia en las Naciones Unidas así como el auge del movimiento de los no-alineados, se tradujo en un apoyo mucho más fuerte a favor de la causa palestina en las instancias multilaterales.

En este contexto, las posiciones latinoamericanas evolucionaron también, aunque con menos radicalidad hacia Israel que las del bloque afroasiático.

Segun tomado de, http://www.aurora-israel.co.il/articulos/israel/Newsletter/61639/?utm_source=Noticias+diarias+Domingo-TEA&utm_medium=30-11-2014%202da%20edic el domingo, 30 de nov. de 2014.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 30, 2014 in Uncategorized

 

Abbas: Palestinians will never recognize Israel as Jewish state

Abbas: Palestinians will never recognize Israel as Jewish state
Speaking to Arab League, PA president accuses Israel of setting up apartheid state, says Palestinians can’t wait any longer for statehood
BY TIMES OF ISRAEL STAFF November 29, 2014, 4:41 pm 79
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas gives a press conference following his meeting with South African president, on November 26, 2014 in Pretoria, as part of his first official visit to South Africa. (photo credit: AFP PHOTO/STEFAN HEUNIS)
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas gives a press conference following his meeting with South African president, on November 26, 2014, in Pretoria, as part of his first official visit to South Africa. (photo credit: AFP PHOTO/STEFAN HEUNIS)NEWSROOM

Lapid: ‘I’m not scared of early elections’Austrian police arrest 13 in mass raids against jihad recruitersPopular ex-Likud minister makes comeback amid talk of early electionErdogan: West doesn’t like Muslims, wants them deadEgypt’s Mubarak acquitted of murder, graft chargesLapid: US veto at Security Council no longer assuredSyria plagued by flesh-eating maggot diseaseAt least 120 dead in Nigeria mosque suicide attackCruzing for Jewish supportIn Montreal, Jews from France see a future for themselves

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said Saturday that the Palestinians would never recognize Israel as a Jewish state, and accused Israel of establishing an apartheid government.

The Palestinian leader was speaking in Cairo at an emergency session of the Arab League with foreign ministers from around the Arab world. His remarks came following a week of intense debate among Israeli politicians about a Knesset bill which would enshrine Israel’s status as a Jewish state in law.
“We will never recognize the Jewishness of the state of Israel,” Abbas was quoted by Channel 10 saying. The news outlet also reported that Abbas threatened to terminate all security cooperation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank unless peace negotiations are revived. Talks collapsed in April, and Israel will not resume them so long as Abbas is partnered with the Hamas terror group in a Palestinian unity government.

Abbas charged that instead of advancing the peace process, Israel was working to set up an apartheid state, including Jews-only buses, establishment of Israeli legal sovereignty over West Bank settlements, the proposed “Jewish state” law, and requirements of declarations of loyalty by citizens.

“Return to negotiations is possible if Israel agrees to a full freeze of settlement [construction], including Jerusalem, release of the fourth group of long-term prisoners, and setting a timetable for negotiations which will begin with setting borders,” Abbas said.

Israel agreed to release four groups of Palestinian prisoners as a precondition for the American-mediated negotiations that began last year, but refused to free the final batch in March in a dispute over Palestinian demands that Israeli Arab prisoners be included, and having failed to secure Abbas’s agreement that the talks would continue beyond the original April deadline.

Abbas said Saturday that the Palestinians weren’t willing to wait any longer for progress and were determined to petition the United Nations Security Council to demand a timetable for the end to Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.

“It’s impossible for us to wait any longer, because Israel continues its aggression and expropriation of lands and setting facts on the ground by continuing to build settlements,” Abbas was quoted saying. “The government of Israel doesn’t want, for internal reasons, to define its borders and we can’t continue with this situation.”

Abbas was expected to receive Arab League approval to lodge the UN petition in the coming days, but did not say when he would do so.

According to Channel 10, Abbas said he asked US Secretary of State John Kerry to cooperate in drafting the Security Council proposal, in order to put pressure on Israel to cease settlement construction.

The resolution is likely — but not certain — to fail, either because it falls short of the needed votes or because the US will veto it. But it will likely add momentum to international backing for Palestinian statehood.

Abbas warned that the Palestinians could take other steps, including joining the International Criminal Court, if the Security Council rejects the resolution.

The PA president said he would take these steps unless Israel “takes responsibility for the situation.”

“The situations in the [West] Bank is dangerous, and can’t continue,” Abbas said. “All signs point to [the fact that] the American mediation [of peace talks] failed with the end of negotiations.”

Read more: Abbas: Palestinians will never recognize Israel as Jewish state | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/abbas-palestinians-will-never-recognize-israel-as-jewish-state/#ixzz3KUHM3ZGX

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on November 29, 2014 in Uncategorized